Why all those dogs?


There's a scene where Corinne encounters a large dog outside the church who then walks alongside her. Then she's surrounded by a number of dogs. Can anyone offer an explanation of this? Thanks.

reply

This is an enactment of the warning given to her by the "therapist" Dr. Adams: that is she could mend her thoughts and ways and continue following the prescribed church life, or she could leave it and go to the dogs (not an exact quote). Hence the scene where she walks into the empty church, is uncertain about faith and life, and then leavs the building to be with a number of dogs.

This is an interesting movie. It isn't anti-Chistian so much as it is a moment to reflect that intellectual, thoughtful insights sometimes find empty the many Biblical quotes often given by believers. These quotes sound good but are never developed with the necessary psychologic considerations to make them truly applicable to a person's dilemma. Hence they sound empty to many of us; they sound like pacifying, but unsatisfying "Bible-bites". In reality, these quotes can be developed with discussion into great thoughts, insights, and lessons about life. This is often done by those well studied in their faiths- be they Christian, Jewish, or other. Unfortunately, in my experience with born agains, they just quote automatically and leave the listener with emptyness- as they did to Corinne. She wanted to believe but has questons that weren't answered by these undeveloped quotes.

reply

This is an enactment of the warning given to her by the "therapist" Dr. Adams: that is she could mend her thoughts and ways and continue following the prescribed church life, or she could leave it and go to the dogs (not an exact quote). Hence the scene where she walks into the empty church, is uncertain about faith and life, and then leavs the building to be with a number of dogs.


basically what you said but to get a little more detail without typing tooo much ;)... he basically said... 'we want you in heaven and not outside with the dogs' (exact words) etc... then not long after she had the scene in the car (looking up in the sky) saying 'lord help me, i can't feel you. i feel nothing!' not to long after and then not to much after that was the scene where she went into the church briefly and then turned around and noticed the dog just outside the church doors and went out to see it and then started noticing more dogs around outside near her and then looked back at the church. which i think we are to just assume that was a little 'sign' (i.e. a message from above) for her that he's (God) there ;)

@ OP... i suspect your probably a little to young to get everything ;) (no offense or anything as i am sure you will get it in due time ;) )

but that's the general idea there in my reply.

p.s. and speaking of that scene in the church... i could be wrong but that sounds like Vera is singing that (the song that's playing). ;) (which it seems to confirm in the credits but i am not 100percent sure but it does sound like her voice though)



----------
My Vote History ... http://imdb.to/rb1gYH
----------

reply

da doc's exact werdz were: u can be either in wid God or out wid da dogz. so literally, she wuz out wid da dogz.

i actually didn't like dat scene. it cheapenz da movie by makin somethin figurative so literal. maybe good in a kidz movie but not dis.

otherwize a great movie on faith

I live, I love, I slay, and I'm content

reply

Hahahahaaaaaaahhhahahaa! Hilarious. Well done. Werdz.

reply

who the *beep* taught you to spell?

reply

I think that the scene was very symbolic in that this is the moment when she chooses to be "outside with the dogs". She never could fully believe.

If I ever was myself, I wasn't that night.

reply


I am a reasonably intelligent man and this film was a total blank for me.I did want that big dog though.
Did Vera Farmigna "let herself go",so to speak physically for the film?

reply

[deleted]

Vera did NOT let herself go! She was 5 months pregnant!!!

reply

I saw the dog and my first thought was, oh, oh, a pit bull, watch out! After viewing the movie, someone reminded me that the dogs were based on a Bible passage that was mentioned in the movie. Someone also reminded me that the mailman represented Jesus and that, in hindsight, makes total sense to me now. This was a very deep movie and deserves multiple viewings for, at least for me, better understanding. (I'm sure, for even better understanding, it would also be a big help to read the book this movie was based on.) Someone in the movie talked about using the "W" word a lot and the camera switched to a lady with a large "W" on the front of her dress. I'm at a loss as to what the "W" word was. Can someone please enlighten me? Thank you.

reply

If I remember correctly in context, I would think the W word was "whore".

-TK

"I've always admired atheists; I think it takes a lot of faith." -Dr. Joel Fleischman

reply

I wonder if people who watch religious movies don't look in their Bibles to see if there is a possible reference? I don't mean to be snarky, but there is a reference in Revelation 22:5 that goes like this.

[i] Outside are the dogs, those who practice magic arts, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood.



So if you are "outside with the dogs" you keep company with those who practice magic arts, sexually immoral people and the rest. I don't know if the congregation felt this way about her, but when you use that strong a symbol and it is not explained well, and there is something in Revelation, I cannot help but think it is no accident, that what she contemplated and then did was pretty bad.

reply

For me, this is the type of stuff that makes no sense with scripture. Why would you equate dogs, innocent domesticated animals, with awful and sinful humans?







🐈 Rachel

reply

Rachel I agree with you. I never proposed that the link between dogs and Biblical symbolism was correct -- only that it was there. Revelation is a nightmare for me to read, but I have to say that I am not the best person to be asking about this. I am not religious in the traditional sense -- maybe in the more general.

I do know people (Catholic mostly) who are not bothered by Revelation, so much so that it is part of their mass. I know others who embrace it in total even to it being literally so -- that each thing seen will come to pass. I tend to think of it as easily misinterpreted.

I found the symbolism and the treatment of an honest searching woman believable. People who don't think will tell you anything as long as it belongs to a code.

As to dogs, I've had 3 and I never thought of them as anything but family. They went everywhere with us.

reply

Sorry - I didn't mean you personally - why would "scripture" equate dogs with the other stuff?

I was raised in church (Methodist) but questioned even as a child - for instance, if you actually read the Bible, you can tell that Magdeline was not the prostitute, yet it was taught for centuries. I would get puzzled looks from adults when I pointed it out. And so on. :)




🐈 Rachel

reply

Oh!? really. What was Magdeline? Or how do you know? What's the clue? Interesting comment. I'm starting to slowly read the Bible. Frankly I'm getting caught in things I really wonder about. Not the miracles which usually troubles modern day people but the sternness of the people in it.

I know we are getting side tracked, but there are not that many people looking at this so I think we have room to discuss all sorts of things.

Take care.

Jerome

reply