What the *beep* is wrong with you all....?
I'm going to refrain from going too in depth here, but you all must either be mentally stunted or 11 years old. Because I honestly don't understand how Nathan- a guy who's jokes almost always revolved around crap and dick punch lines- could in any way be considered a superior character than Rudy...?
He was obnoxious, callous and completely 1 dimensional. I'll admit that Rudy can obviously be quite obnoxious as well, but at least the writer's wrote him as witty and gave him an IQ that exceeded minus 5.
I don't mean to be a complete *beep* here, but the way you all seem to *beep* on the show for switching up the cast I'd completely baffling to me. There isn't too much more they could have done with the same characters, over and over again. It was a huge risk for the show to even continue after all of the original cast left, but I prefer them taking that risk as opposed to ending after 2 seasons. Also, do prefer the later seasons to the original two. Big time. The only aspect of season 1 and 2 that intrigued me was the story line between future Simon and Alisha. The rest was stale, and Nathan and Kelly both got *really, really* old, *really, really* fast. I understand that it's all subjective and that this is just my opinion. Fine. But I can't for the life of me comprehend how so many of you can be so confined to your little comfort bubbles that you actually stopped watching the series after the last original character died off.
I can't stand people as predictable and transparent as you lot. Go watch Family Guy or something equally as eradicated of substance/ surprise.