Seriously? This movie cost MORE than it cost to make Clueless and wasn't even half as good. Yes it had a few OK moments but for $16 Million why not just make a sequel to one of the most succesful teen comedy movies of all time? Clueless cost $12 Million and grossed over $77 million at the box office. You live and learn Amy!
shareI'm not sure they'll ever touch a Clueless sequel with Brittany Murphy dead...and Stacey Dash a crazy Repub!
shareIf this movie really cost 16 mln $ then I truly don’t understand distribution strategy… With very limited theatrical release (it is being showed only on 1 screen!) and followed by DVD/BR release how they want to make that money back? I am not judging whether the movie is good or bad but I am challenging the way how they are wasting talents involved in this production. Very weird.
_______________
come to my madness: www.marillion.com
I thought the movie was ok
share$16 Million is nothing these days !! and $12 Million for Clueless remember was 17 years ago inflation anyone ???
shareAdjust for inflation and the budget for Clueless is about twice as much as Vamps.
________________________________________
!
According to the box office report on IMDB, Vamps made less than $3000 at the box office, which means that it lost $15,997,000. I doubt that we'll ever see a Vamps II.
shareNo Clueless sequel!
Kramer: ...he was very impressed with what I do.
Elaine: What you do? You don't do anything!