MovieChat Forums > Turtles Forever (2009) Discussion > People who complain about how they treat...

People who complain about how they treated the..


87 turtles, I was much more upset how the 2003 villians treated Shredder and Krang! The new Shredder beat them up like 3 times when the 87 Shredder and Krang were just complementing him!!!

reply

Only an idiot would criticize this masterpiece.

That's what I love about these high school girls, man. I get older, they stay the same age.

reply

It's pretty ridiculous how they treated the 80s characters. It was like a parody of the show rather then legitimately trying to add the characters in.

reply

Agreed TMNT 2012 episode 10 of Season 4 did a crossover with the 80's turtles but made Krang the villain, but they showed more love & respect for the characters than this movie did.

reply

Masterpiece? The whole film was just a big middle finger to the thing which made the franchise popular in the first place. The Turtles would still be an obscure comic book if not for the 80's cartoon.

It wasn't even an accurate representation of the 80's Turtles and they twisted things to make them look exceptionally goofy then had the cheek to rip the piss out them for the whole film.

It could have been the greatest Turtles film ever if they all just collaborated and had equal footing but it was a complete joke as the 80's show was never like that.

Really poor show by the makers of this film.

reply

It's absolute bullcrap that Krang and '87 Shredder got completely manhandled by an utrom.

reply

I think what was worst was most of the time they just sat back and took it all. They were all intentionally treated as pure jokes. Just because they used a fair amount of humor in the old show doesn't mean they weren't still villains. Shredder was in fact constantly trying to kill the turtles. And he could still fight.

reply

Yeah, some of it was warranted, some of it was funny, but some of it just took things too far. I would have done a lot of things differently myself, but it was still a good movie.

reply

I thought the mutant guy (what was his name? Han?) getting angry at Raphael for breaking the Fourth wall was REALLY funny, but most of the time I was just sighing in frustration. You'd think these characters had never been in a fight before.

reply

The way I look at it is that it's sort of like the movie Last Action Hero. When Jack Slater goes into the real world, he's unable to blow up a car with one shot, punch through glass without hurting his hand, get shot and not be just a flesh wound. It's the same here with the 80s Turtles, Shredder, and Krang - they're just weaker in the 2003 Turtles universe compared to when in their own universe. Like 80's Mikey said - the manhole covers were a lot heavier in that universe.

_______________________________________
Stupid people make me angry.

reply

But why? It's still a universe with Mutant Turtles.

reply

Same reason why cars don't blow up with a single shot in our universe. The physics in that universe are just different compared to theirs.

_______________________________________
Stupid people make me angry.

reply

But they can still lift up a sewer hole lid. And they are still mutant turtles. There's nothing inherently different about that. It's just that the new guys can do it and the old guys can't. How come the Mutagen still works in their dimension, but their muscles don't?

reply

Because it's made out of heavier material than the ones in their world. Again, I'll use the Last Action Hero analogy - Jack Slater is still Jack Slater when he comes into our world. His gun still works, his fist still works, it's just that it's not as effective as it is in his world.

_______________________________________
Stupid people make me angry.

reply

Are you saying the sewer covers are heavier or the Turtles Muscles are weaker? I don't understand.

reply

The covers are heavier. Have you seen how easily the covers fly out of the ground in the 80s cartoon? They could be thrown around like a frizbee. Basically, the manhole covers in the 2003 cartoon are more like real ones so you can't just lift them up like they're nothing, even if you're a hulking body builder.

And as for Shredder and Krang, well their whole world was full of bumbling goofballs, and that included the turtles of their universe, so they've never had to put up a real fight. When it came to fighting the Utrom Shredder, they didn't stand a chance.
_______________________________________
Stupid people make me angry.

reply

Also, note that the 80s turtles are actually smaller than the 2003 turtles, so the 2003 turtles would be stronger than them. It's like the difference between middle weight and heavy weight, you might be the strongest middle weight, but the heavy weight would still out match you.

_______________________________________
Stupid people make me angry.

reply

Being shorter doesn't necessarily mean being less strong. They could have easily been written as being the same physical strength.

Shredder tended to do pretty well in fights with people other than the turtles who were main characters, and even then sometimes he could win. I think turning him and Krang into pitiful chumps was completely unnecessary. Even if they couldn't defeat him in single combat, why would they just sit around and let him do that? It didn't seem to be anything other than the movie's attempt to force "OUR SHOW GOOD! OLD SHOW BAD!" down the throat of the audience. and to be honest, I didn't find utrom Shredder more intimidating than "Old School Shredder" until he was in his Shredder suit. He's still a rather silly looking alien deep down. Didn't he even have cartoony Xs on his eyes at the start?

reply

Actually, his eyes were closed and there's a tattoo, or scar over his left eye which might have been mistaken for Xs if not paying attention.

I'm still going to stand by the fact that 80s turtleverse follows cartoon logic/physics and 2003 turtleverse is closer to real life logic/physics, hense the weaker and goofier 80s characters, but I'll admit, they're a tad sillier than ones from the actual 80s cartoon.

_______________________________________
Stupid people make me angry.

reply

[deleted]

That's an interesting theory, but after the show got sillier, it became more serious again during the Red Sky seasons.

reply

I really don't buy that. If they were never afraid of dieing only because they always knew they were in a TV show, then they should know that they were still in one now. Raphael still broke the 4th wall. Everything about the 80s show was exaggerated to look stupid. From the Turtles and their weapons, to Shredder and Krang, to April and the dimension itself. The writers were intentionally making it all look as pathetic and lame as possible. They seemed pretty desperate to enforce the idea that their show was better in just about every way.


The other thing worth noting was that the theory about things being heavier in the 2003 dimension might in fact be a vaguely reasonable solution to why Michelangelo might have a little troubling lifting a sewer lid, except Donatello already tossed what appeared to be a giant boulder with his staff earlier on in the movie, it that seems a little inconsistent to me.

reply

It would have been on thing if he would have exerted himself and made a comment about the lids being heavier, but to have him not be able to lift it at all was taking the joke too far.

reply

Alright, so if you can't accept the fact that '87 Mikey can't lift the manhole cover, then maybe it's not the weight alone. Perhaps he wasn't lifting it the right way. I'm not 100% sure how real ones are, but I get the sense that you need a special tool to remove them so that not just any schmuck looking to cause some mischief can take it out if they just had a crowbar with them. You never see exactly how 2003 Raph lifts it up, so maybe there's a special way of doing it that '87 Mikey didn't know of.

_______________________________________
Stupid people make me angry.

reply

My theory on why Shredder and Krang let Utrom Shredder do what he did is because the original cartoon villains were actually pretty lazy anyways!

I mean, Shredder and Krang were lazy villains. They stole most their technology, fooled others into doing their dirty work, and really were just plain lazy characters to begin with! Even in the "Shredderville" episode, when that Shredder rules New York City, he's too lazy to keep the city out of disrepair and lets the Technodrome get run down. They are lazy villains!

I mean, when they were sitting there watching Utrom Shredder while eating popcorn it was a classic moment. They liked watching how a serious villain worked, and the Utrom Shredder made vast improvements to the Technodrome, the Foot Soldiers, everything! Now when they go back to the 1987 Toon Universe they have a superbly upgraded Technodrome with both Dimension X and Utrom technology! Yet with their new superior Technodrome they would most likely still bungle every scheme they get! When Shredder attacked Krang in his walker you knew he'd wanted to do that to Krang for years!

Somebody brought up that the drastic portrayal of the 1987 Turtles might be because the other Universe works differently. In a way, that does make sense. Mutagen in the 2003-verse makes fiercer mutants, and yet the 1987 lasers out of the Turtle Van (aka Party Wagon as called on the toy version) don't have as much of an effect on stuff in the 2003-verse. Also back to the Turtles being in public maybe by the time this film happens they've become more accepted by their public (near the end of the series the Channel 6 news crew, Burne and Vernon, had more meetings with the Turtles at least).

One theory though is that this film takes place before Season 8 of the original series when the sky turned red, April started wearing the brown leather jacket, and things got grittier. Maybe this little adventure helped prepare them for those episodes as things got harder to fight.

Also, if you notice the 2003-verse was starting to have similar attributes to the original series. Splinter watching a soap opera like Krang used to? On Channel 6 of all stations as well (got interrupted with a Channel 6 News Bulletin about the 1987 series Turtles fighting Hun)? April wearing a yellow (and black though) track suit?

The original Turtles cartoon was more creative, and it had a lot of interesting oddities. The newer one though is rooted in more realism and the comics (as the comics eventually became).

Sincerely,
Exchronos

reply

If they were never afraid of dieing only because they always knew they were in a TV show, then they should know that they were still in one now. Raphael still broke the 4th wall. Everything about the 87 show was exaggerated to look stupid.

The jokes cracked at the expense of the original series were clearly intentional, but if it helps to get my earlier point across, think of what was done in this movie as what happens when adapting a property from one format to another. The most important thing to remember is that the rules change. They can change a little or a lot, but they still change.

The Ninja Turtles Multiverse is just that, a Multiverse. As ExChronos mentioned in the above post, the movie seems to have made it pretty clear that each dimension has its own set of rules. Although the Classic Turtles may never have been killed off in their own world, that doesn't mean it cant happen in another one.

We all have our problems, some just hide it better.

reply

Oh, and one more thing too. I know the Technodrome has a dimensional portal, but technically, isn't the movie about alternate timelines?

I mean, when you think of Dimensions as the classic Turtles cartoon used, they aren't alternate timelines but different places in space-time with their own unique weird beings (from Dimension X to Ogg, to the places Usagi Yojimbo are from and went to). "Turtles Prime" would just be the one timeline that all the others diverged from somehow, thus quantumly linking them together (there's a Star Trek: The Next Generation episode where Worf is continuously seemlessly inhabiting one alternate reality to another until they can find the temporal anomaly he passed through and find the universe with his quantum/temporal signature).

I mean, yeah, they call them dimensions all the way throughout the film, but isn't it more like the TMNT multi-verse represents alternate realities instead of alternate dimensions? Or do I just think too much?

Sincerely,
Exchronos

reply

I dont think you think too much, its a valid point there.

I also have NO IDEA why my first post in this thread was deleted, especially since I wasn't actually saying anything genuinely antagonistic or denying anyone their right to complain, but was infact attempting to present a valid point. It may not have been made using my own words, but its still valid. Besides, its not as if I was telling those people complaining to shut the hell up or anything (which I would've done straight up if I wanted to do so). Oh well, whatever, what's done is done and I'm not gonna hold it against the admins since they were just doing their job.

We all have our problems, some just hide it better.

reply

Alternate dimensions and alternate timelines are the same thing. Dimension X is simply a timeline that diverged from the main one drastically farther back in time. It would had to have diverged far enough back to where something could have prevented evolution as we know it from taking place on the earth considering their version of earth is populated by creatures made out of stone as well as the "Krangezoids". I personally think that the Utroms colonized the primordial earth in Dimension X and evolved into a humanoid lizard species, which Krang would have been a member of. This would explain Krang's relation to the Utroms. It could be that when the inhabitants of Dimension X earth banished Krang for his crimes and reduced him to a living brain, that they were simply reverting him to an earlier form of his species. This would make his form different yet similar to an Utrom. Somehow the presence of the Utroms on earth would had to have prevented the native carbon based life from developing, which would then make room for a completely different form of life to somehow originate from rocks.

reply