MovieChat Forums > Haunting of Winchester House (2009) Discussion > good movie.

good movie.

posted 15 years ago by darkwarlrd
18 replies | jump to latest

I usually dont take chances on movies I never heard of and always check imdb's message board or userscores. but being an fan of the "haunting" movies, i checked it out anyways with no posts/reviews on this site yet. was very good...ending was a mind-***k too, something you kinda thought about during the course of the movie, but wasnt positive about.

[–] onesunday 15 years ago

im going to watch it after reading this comment

if it sucks i will blame u :)

[–] pitbull_uk 15 years ago

it does suck, its an asylum movie

[–] Golobrad 15 years ago

Oh dear, what a waste of time that was. It's very poor. Predictable scene by scene story, hammy acting, ugly photography, lowgrade greenscreen style things going on. Not wasting anymore time with this film in writing more

[–] j1j1s1 15 years ago

Honestly?

I've seen better acting and dialogue in a seventies porno.

I can usually give even bad movies a chance but this was just terrible.

[–] Rooster82 15 years ago

How can you not see that darkwarlrd is an asylum stooge. The person made the account only a few days ago and this is his/her only comment.

Good thing I didn't bother downloading this movie, I knew it was gonna be *beep*

[–] zanydeath 15 years ago

Amazing,not one scare in the whole film.Very little blood and most of all.... ...dull. Mediocre acting,direction,videography,and who didn't see that telegraphed ending coming? Not as bad as some other Asylum films(Death Racers anyone?) but that's not a recommendation. I'm glad Asylum guru David Micheal Latt has such a tight handle on the quality control. We couldn't have a good scary movie getting out now could we?

[–] Xcalat3 15 years ago

NOT

When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

[–] Ennder 15 years ago

Watch the first 5 minutes, watch the last 5 minutes. Rest of film really isnt worth watching.

[–] havok_2002 15 years ago

The worst movie I've seen in 2009. The acting is like they found three random people on the street and said "hey, wanna be in a movie?"

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] mrnocal 14 years ago

Not the worst horror movie I've ever seen...but miles away from the best. The acting was awful...kind of like acting you'd see on "America's Most Wanted". Oh, wait...the lead actress' 8 credits include her rousing performance as "Halloween House Woman" on "America's Most Wanted". Go figger...

The ending was an interesting twist, but not original at all...Sixth Sense did it waaaaay better. And I agree about the bad blue-screen effects. Very amateurish. Guess that's why this movie was straight to video.

Not worth a rental cost. Wait for it to be free on TV....and be a little whiskified™ to appreciate it. Of course, whiskification™ makes even "Saved by the Bell" watchable. :shrugs:

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] duffbeer123456 14 years ago

The film itself is beyond boring. the 3-D effect washed out all the color as someone had mentioned before. the acting was the most horrid thing about the movie NOT TO MENTION the bad continuity and editing. the only thing that saved this film was the last 10 minutes. The twist I did not pick up on and was completely surprised. It was nothing like the sixth sense. the sixth sense was enjoyable throught the film this movie sucked anal leakage big time but the ending was good and surpising.

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]