The title says all..


"In 3d". huh?? you get a very obvious cliche vibe just by viewing the title's cover. The move does not prove it wrong. With a film like this, you are stuck in a room with one actor. The writers must make that character personable, or enjoyable to watch or like. I did not feel that way about the man in the room. His comments and remarks did not have much substance to them at all, so it was a bit bland to see. I think they were going with the love to hate approach, maybe not. Making the character arrogant and cocky, so you would somewhat enjoy his suffering. Which is common. However, I just could not buy into his acting. I could not find any real reason this film was made or why the watcher would find it watchable. Suspense was non-existent, characters bland, story faltered.

reply

[deleted]

The male actor was terrible. It's a hard part to pull off but I thought he failed miserably. This didn't help matters.

If you want to see good acting in a film, where only one character is involved in most of the scenes, then watch Wrecked. That film also shows, how with good acting, an abundant of dialogue is actually not needed to hold the attention of the viewer.

reply

Spot on comment. Iron Bores is much more approprate.

reply