Marketing Visionary!?!?


Seeing that this film is using the "Marketing Visionary" behind it as a way of enticing people to see it, I watched this trailer expecting it to be a comedy, a satire on commercialisation in kids entertainment. I waited for the punchline, and.....

Hmmm....

Seems I was wrong. It's just a straight kids film.

So, you're telling me that advertising the fact that this film is purely marketing driven is supposed to be a way of getting parents to see this film?? I feel that's really crass and cynical. "Yeah, they're good! They really got my money last time, so this film MUST be good!"... and since when have people who work in marketing been visionaries? What's their vision?? To get us to part with cash!!!

Now, I'm not naive by thinking that marketing to children is a new or original concept, it's hard to walk into a toy department and find something that's not connected to a movie, or TV show; but as parents are we really this jaded?

reply

I am looking forward to this movie, as the parent of a 3 1/2 year old. It encourages kids to get up and dance and interact with the movie. I am not going to this movie expecting an award-winning performance by any of the actors. I am going to take my daughter to this movie so that she can have a nice experience. I don't think they expect it to be a big-box-office, award-winning, record-breaking smash success. Let's just take it for what it is - a kids movie.

reply

mdlfan,

I am not a parent, but I must ask you this: are you completely okay with the fact that you will be taking a 3 1/2 year old to see a movie that costs you $7 bucks per ticket (at least $14 for both you and your child and anyone else who may go with you, plus those expensive drinks and snacks add up to at least a $28 total) when you could have picked up a cheap DVD copy of some kids show that does the EXACT SAME THING and played it at your own home? Think of the convenience, money, and possible injuries you could prevent (really, allowing a 3 1/2 year old to dance in crowded aisles with stairs and slippery floors?).

Plus, I hate when people use the "it's a kids' show" line as an excuse. That's no excuse for making a movie that seems to talk down to kids rather than really engaging them in activities that would be beneficial in learning.




"You Kol'd?" ^J^
Hetalians unite!

reply

Isn't getting up, dancing and interacting exactly what you're NOT supposed to do at the movie theater? Oogieloves is teaching kids it's okay to be loud and obnoxious while in the theater.

"Bullets! My one weakness. How did you know?"

reply

First off, I think that the first time a kid goes tot the movies is a special thing. So yes I am ok with spending the $7 for us to go see that movie. And I would not buy her the stupid sodas and popcorn. You don't need that to enjoy a movie and I don't want to teach her to associate going to movies with unhealthy foods. As far as the educational value of this movie goes, I am not expecting her to become a genius from watching this. I am hoping she will have fun. If you expect to teach kids something every minute of every day then when will they ever have fun?

I am taking her to see a movie that doesn't have foul language, sexual innuendo, or violence. I will probably not enjoy the movie as much as I will enjoy her reaction to the movie. To me, that is priceless.

reply

I'm guessing you were responding to my comment.

First of all, although not related to the point I'm about to make, what kind of logic is not-giving-unhealthy-foods-to-my-kid-at-any-time-is-going-to-influence-my-child's-future-eating-habits-even-though-my-child-is-still-too-young-to-understand-nutrition-and-cannot-prepare-meals-for-herself anyway? I believe it is important to make sure your child eats healthy foods,and your intentions are good, but your reasoning that restricting your child's diet is going to somehow "control" your daughter's future eating habits is completely unfounded and ludicrous. Think about it for a moment. By the way, I brought up that "point" with my mother (a registered nurse for 30 years with a degree in psychology) who thought your belief is ridiculous (plus, I was given popcorn and some soda around the same age, and I have never been overweight and I am in very fair health because my mother taught me good eating habits when I was actually old enough to understand them AND raised me on a healthy diet even with a small allowance of "junk food").

Second, you are so strict on your daughter's diet, yet you want to take her to this...movie (I barely call it a "movie") to have fun, because according to your logic, there is apparently no other way for your daughter to have fun for free instead of taking her to this movie that panders only to an audience to make money (the words "marketing visionary" were included in the trailer for a reason...). Let me tell you how you can have fun for free WHILE bonding with your daughter in a way that a cheap-looking, whiny, and brainless film can not: you can take your daughter to a park and push her on the swings, plan a picnic and let her help out, play dolls with her, play "beauty salon", let her play dress up with some of your clothes, do arts and crafts with supplies you have at home; the possibilities are unlimited. Don't tell me that a film is the only way a child can have fun.

On one last note, if you really want her to watch something child friendly (since you would probably believe that I'm being one of those people who disapproves in media as an outlet for children's entertainment, and I'm far from that), I recommend, again, something you can rent at home or buy for a relatively low price, such as episodes of Blues Clues, Little Bear, Out of the Box; shows that entertain your child without screaming at them or encouraging them to dance around in a movie theater. (Which reminds me, by your food logic from earlier, if eating junk food at 3.5 years old directly causes one to eat junk food at 13.5 years old, wouldn't being told to "dance during the movie" at 3.5 years old cause them to scream at the movie screen at 13.5 years old, which is very disruptive behavior, if you weren't already aware).

And yes, these are my beliefs, and I had a very happy and fulfilled childhood.



"You Kol'd?" ^J^
Hetalians unite!

reply

Oh, and please pardon the spelling errors-seems as though there is a bug in this field where if you type too much text while on the mobile site that you can't scroll up to review what you wrote :)

reply

Marketing Visionary is just another way of saying he's had successes in the past. Tellytubbies were made fun of, but they were also extremely popular. In other words, he knows what parents want. It's marketed to a very narrow demographic, but one that consistently demonstrates a steady demand for his product. For parents with kids of a certain age, they are grateful for anything which will occupy their attention.




Orgies are not too much fun if no one wants to do it with you.

reply

@mdfan I'm not sure taking a 3 year old to a movie that encourages shouting and dancing in a movie theater is a good thing. It's bad enough kids aren't taught better manners to begin with, but this movie would make the problem worse.


reply

Really? We are talking about a 3 year old and a kids movie. Let them dance and have fun. There is a another time and place to teach "movie theater" etiquette.

reply

could be worse, soon youll find movies saying FROM THE ELECTRICIST THAT BROUGHT YOU THE AVENGERS AND INCEPTION!!!!

reply

Maybe i'm the only one....but does world really need a bunch of dancing kids? Movie theaters are short on leg room and large on darkness, both of those lend themselves to one thing happening.....a single sprained ankle and a furious parent, who does what???? files a lawsuit....which does what? instantly creates rules that you must remain seated for the duration of the movie unless you are getting up to leave the theater, and ensures that no theater ever plays a movie the encourages this non sense.

I get that kids like to dance, but they don't need to watch creepy movies to get up and dance.

And, well, no, i guess no and is required...argument sufficiently concluded.

reply

[deleted]