MovieChat Forums > Aayirathil Oruvan (2010) Discussion > Worst movie, how come people dont see a ...

Worst movie, how come people dont see a similarity.lack of exposure


the movie turned out a mixed response from the audience.
Those who hadnt watched much movies, and love masala aspects loved it.


the movie had various ingredients from big Hollywood adventure movies.
Story ditto from Davinci code Frame.

I dont want to waste my time explaining the scenes and mannerism copied from Tomb raider, National treasure,mummy,Gladiator or apocalypto.

Portrayal of obscenity and mass rape, and using military name etc have to be looked after.



http://i64.servimg.com/u/f64/13/24/22/96/the_da10.jpg

The next image is
Selvaraghavan's word to a press.The right side contains a version of a critic.

http://i64.servimg.com/u/f64/13/24/22/96/selvat10.jpg


Certainly i have to appreciate the effort of selva to spend 2 years and over 35 Crores to make One of the worst movies ever created in the history of tamil movies.
Bet he is waiting for some ingredients of upcoming hollywood movies to add in his sequel.








Life is all a Dew that comes all New

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=37690973

reply

Selva is *beep* crappy director. Karti Sivakumar and Reema sen acting was god but the movie was just mixed with some hollywood films and bad bad bad really bad graphics. Terrible screenplay, unnecessary vulgar language and scenes and the directionen was pure crap.


Selva should do bollywood movies, they will like him more and he will fit into their way of copy and paste hollywood flicks. Selva should be banned for making movies in tamil!!!!

reply

You do not understand. This movie was intended to be a B grade fantasy/adventure and it delivered it. I understand that many scenes very similar to several Hollywood movies but I would give full credits to Selva for what he tried and delivered.

reply

I don't understand? They did shoot the movie for 3 years, and have a 32 crore budget. And you are saying, it was intended to be a b grade fantasy / adventure? You are stupid as *beep*

Selva didn't try anything new, seen everything before. The screenplay was so terrible in this movie, it almost made me throw up.


It's official. You're delusional.

reply

You won't understand.

"They did shoot the movie for 3 years, and have a 32 crore budget. And you are saying, it was intended to be a b grade fantasy / adventure? You are stupid as *beep*"

It is like saying Robert Rodriguez intended to make a realistic film on 'one man struggle fighting corrupt American politicians for his country and his fellow immigrants' in Machete or like he intended do a freaking horror in 'From Dusk Till Dawn'.

And what does it have to with having a 32 crore budget and a 3 year shoot? Oh man you are real funny!

Your trouble is that the film didn't deliver what you expected. And that doesn't mean that the film is a complete crap. Period.


reply

Your trouble is that the film didn't deliver what you expected. And that doesn't mean that the film is a complete crap. Period.



Hahaha Very funny.

A movie's success doesn't depend on what it is supposed to deliver.
It depends on a good story line and content, which the movie lacks.

i guess u ll never accept that the movie was bad.




http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=37690973&s=reverse_uservote

reply

Honestly, do read your statement for yourself:

"A movie's success doesn't depend on what it is supposed to deliver.
It depends on a good story line and content, which the movie lacks."

Aren't you contradicting yourself?

And, I never mentioned that the movie was a success. My point is that the movie is not crap as you guys argue.


reply

That is called archeological adventure. This how it looks. It is a genre Tomb raider, National treasure,mummy all belong to that genre. Even u a re going accuse those films u mentioned are copy of one another.

reply