MovieChat Forums > Apocalypse: La 2ème guerre mondiale (2009) Discussion > Superb visuals, but hardly revolutionary...

Superb visuals, but hardly revolutionary.


First I'd like to say this is an awesome documentary. The script is very well done, informative, and fascinating to say the least. The footage is authentic, in colors, and probably the best I've seen in a WW2 documentary. It's hard to compress WW2 in only 6 episodes but this manages it, even if it is focused on Europe.

However It continues to spread disinformation and inaccuracies that arose from German propaganda and early (western) historical misconceptions on the Polish campaign.

1. Although far from the worst, Polish resistance is downplayed especially in comparison to the French one, even if the Germans actually had fairly high casualties on this front. For instance, the Polish airforce, even with obsolete planes managed to shoot down 285 German planes, losing about 330 themselves. However the Germans several times their numbers in aircraft.

2. The documentary claims that Polish horse cavalry charged German tanks (and were thus doomed to lose). There is no historical basis for this, and is a result of German propaganda to ridicule the Polish "Üntermench." Yes the Polish had horse cavalry, and a long proud tradition for it, but they never attempted to actually charge armored forces.

Instead most of the Polish cavalry fought dismounted, and had access to Anti-Tank guns and other infantry weapons. The few times they actually did charge the enemy they were mostly successful and actually managed to rout German infantry and weapon crews. Despite this success the commanders were very reluctant to use cavalry charge as a tactic, knowing full well how poor it is against entrenched infantry with machineguns.

3. And of course it presents the invasion of Poland as a textbook example of Blitzkrieg, while the actual strategies used where based on the old-fashioned encirclement tactics where the armor, artillery and airforce supports the infantry in surrounding the enemy and destroying them in detail.

Of course I'm no expert and there may be more examples of inaccuracies, but overall I think it was a very good series.

reply

I am sure what you're saying has some merit to it. I think the reason why they downplay poland for instance, is because the documentary is french, of course it shows their perspective and approach to it all.

Why else would they especially point out "even" Fernandel, a famous french actor, signed up and went to war. Hardly relevant to the borader picture. Eg. actors Toshirô Mifune was a drill instructor in the japanse army and Alec Guiness sailed with the british convoys across the atlantic.

Not knowing, if you're polish yourself. I can tell you, that I am not. Come to think of it, maybe that doesn't matter really. That's not where I am going with this. Please forgive me..

But I will say this: For all my watching of Discovery- and History Channel in my so far 27-old lifespan, I've never seen a show like this one, that told SO MUCH ( no pun intended ) of and about the poles, as this.

If it's enough or not, everybody will have to decide for themselves. These were my 2 cents thrown in.




Karate Kat Street Frogs Mini-Monsters Tigersharks DVD: ipetitions.com/petition/comicstripondvd?e

reply

Sorry for the very late reply, I'm not so active on IMDB.

No, I'm not Polish. However I hate distortion of history, and the treatment of the polish in ww2 has been often ignored or ridiculed in most western war documentaries (and probably Russian ones as well), so I had hoped when I read it talked about the Polish campaign that it would treat this with the same respect to accurate sources as it does the western one.

I'm not surprised the emphasis is on the French, it is after all made for Frenchmen, but the same criticism is often directed against American or English.

Still, the series is well worth watching, as long as one is made aware of factual errors.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Accurate perspective, in my opinion.

reply