My interpretation of the ending is that Scott is rescued, meaning he is dragged out of the corn field and therefore either lives or dies but doesn't become one of the zombies/Husk's puppets.
The reason(s) I am inclined to believe this is that we know the scarecrows can't leave the field, and at the end we see Husk lie down simply because that's all he can do, given the fact that he's at the edge of the cornfield and never in the movie is the scarecrow shown to attack outside it, not even jump out of it to drag someone into the field, as one might think he could do to the farmers at the end of the movie.
On the other hand, Scott can't have become one of his zombies because we know that they all need to go back to the house and sew themselves a pretty scarecrow outfit. And if he were actually dead and becoming a zombie, he wouldn't just lie there waiting for help, he would instead turn around and walk all the way back to the house (the way I see it).
Earlier in the movie, we see that Natalie spots a scarecrow lying on the edge of the cornfield, and he doesn't show any sign of being anything but a scarecrow. He does see a boy, but he appears to be alive and well, and he runs into the field rather than appear to want to get out of it or need help. (By the way, who is this boy? It isn't the friend that disappeared first, is it?)
Perhaps they left it at that point because it's got a lot more impact to end a movie in this manner rather than show the agreeable character get rescued and driven off the scene of the crime/haunted house or location, etc. which feels a little old-school and not really the way thrillers or horror movies tend to end these days. And also because we don't really know whether Scott will survive or not.
I doubt that the farmers would want to explore the cornfield if they find someone who needs help -moreover, I think Scott would want to encourage them to leave asap.
reply
share