Very cool film!!


I loved it!

reply

Me too, but I could have done with colour, there was no reason to make it black and white, there was no artistic value there, even if it was meant as a sort of War of the Worlds broadcast type thing, just because it is going on in the early 20th century, it doesn't mean the world was black and white then, it was probably more colourful then it is now, at least in cities which are mostly smog now.

But then again, I forgot that it was black and white half way through, but that just adds to my opinion that it was unnecessary.

"You were assimilated, resistance was futile!"

reply

As i understand it, the idea for the project was to make the movies fit with the realease dates of the tales, so "The call of Cthulhu" was made a silent film to resemble a 1920's movie, since the tale was released in 1926.

The whisperer in darkness (tale) was released in 1930, and the first color feature movie was released four years later. There had been previous attempts at color, hand painting color into each frame, but that was expensive and not very common at the time. The hammer horror films remained in B/W until late 1950's

reply

Orson Welles once said, "Black and White is the actor's friend."
I would echo that, subbing "cinematographer" for "actor."

There's something magical about black & white; which doesn't mean that films in color can't be magical. -- After all, this is NOT a "color-VS.-black-&-white" thing here, and people should not try to frame it as such.
Also, suggesting that color is somehow "better" than black & white is a moot argument, best left for children who simply don't know any better.

reply

I agree, but my point was that since I totally forgot about the B&W nature of the film, I don't see it as a necessary procedure, in fact, I remember it in colour now for some reason, scenes that I remember are in colour in my mind. Who said colour is better than B&W? But that being said, reality is full of colour, and most films mimic reality, but the whole idea of film is fantasy, so B&W can be a nice artistic touch on occasion.

I don't know if you watch Boardwalk Empire, but imagine it filmed like it was filmed in the 20s, it would be ridiculous. I far prefer watching it as if I was there, the way it really was, full of life and colour and personality.

"You were assimilated, resistance was futile!"

reply

Just watched the Bluray, and I thought it was well done. The acting and effects were actually quite good, especially considering the budget. "The Whisperer in the Darkness" was never one of my personal favorite stories, so I was surprised I liked it so much.

I just really appreciate this group's mission to translate Lovecraft as faithfully as possible to the screen.

reply

I also loved it and wouldn't have changed it one bit.

The B&W added to the eeriness of the film IMO.

reply

It was a very nice movie, but not very faithful.

reply

[deleted]

Fantastic low budget film, with the special effects and b & w cinematography reminiscent of the serials from the '30s. Story was set in the correct era adding to a true interpretation of the story. I enjoyed the manner in which H.P. was translated to the screen and hope that the creators make another successful adaptation of a Lovecraft story. Kudos to the crew!

reply

[deleted]

Agreed. It's actually one of my favorite Lovecraft stories, and while the last 40 minutes deviated from the story, it was done well and it makes sense that they added a bit more to the story given it's short length.

"The world is indeed comic, but the joke is on mankind" ~H.P. Lovecraft

reply

I'm new to Lovecraft and I wonder where the filmmakers got the inspiration for the last 40 minutes. Especially the part with the portal and throwing Akeley in it.
Have you played Amnesia: The Dark Descent? It's inspired by Lovecraft too. And at the end, and sorry for spoiling the story if you haven't played it, the bad guy has a portal too and you can spoil his ritual by throwing another man's head in it. Almost exactly like in this movie.
Does something like this happens somewhere in any of the Lovecaft's books? Or is it just a coincidence?

By the way, I loved the movie. I liked that it was faithful to the source material for the first half and then got more creative for the second half. It only makes sense to do that, because the original story, as good as it was, could not work as a movie. And with the added continuation the movie flows well and it's intense all the way.
The only problem I have with the film is that the old movie gimmick wasn't necessary and didn't even work well. The Call of Cthulhu film felt like a silent film from that era, Whisperer in Darkness didn't feel like a 30s black and white film at all. For one thing, back in the 30s there was no CGI monsters and poorly done photoshop images. :) I like that it's in black and white though, many more horror filmmakers should consider making films in black and white.

reply

Finally saw it and loved it myself! I liked that it was a period film, that it was in black and white and that it had that Lovecraft type atmosphere! One of my favorite Lovecraft adaptations so far!

reply

Yes, I am a stickler for "the Lovecraftian feel/atmosphere/ambience", which is why I despise 99% of the so-called "Lovecraft" films extant to this point. Although they took liberties with HPL's original story, the producers are among that exceedingly rare and rarified crowd who truly understand the Master. That is: even their divergences and innovations managed to stay Lovecraftian, which is what elevates this film above most other attempts, e.g.:

SPOILERS




SPOILERS


The Mi-Go/Yuggothians were equipped with special apparati that assisted their winged space travels, and with a lens-like device attached to their "heads" that made the simulacrum of human vision workable for them. None of this really violates HPL's original story, but rather enhances it and makes the Yuggothians even more believable as star-travelers. The painstaking introduction of (appropriately rain-soaked) newspapers of the period was a grand gesture, as was the non-gratuitous debate between Wilmarth and Charles Fort, with (ahem) "Mr. Bradbury" as the moderator. Even the slickly obnoxious Success Boy who ends the film by flying with his blonde girlfriend over South American mountains has his reflection and resonance in HPL's contempt for the overtly "wholesome", athletic American male, as evidence by Edward Malone's story in The Haunter of the Dark. And the surprising, tragic fate of the sad nymphet Hannah (whither Autumn Wendel anyway? She practically stole the show) is appropriately Lovecraftian in its menace, terror, and hopelessness.

So it would appear that these guys really know what they're doing. So long as they don't lose their independence and don't get too big for their britches, I would love to see them adapt other Lovecraft novellas or even some short stories for the screen.

reply

Making the soundtrack mono and have the mix "dry" would give it a total vintage feel. I love the film just the same.

reply