Are you people dumb?


6.4 lmfao. The metacritic score is 39% which would be a 3.9. just shows that the general public has a pretty *beep* taste in movies.

reply

[deleted]

Actually it shows that you allow the metacritic score to determine your opinions for you. Most people rate films according to their own opinions.

reply

Yeah and their opinions suck. Because the general public has a crappy taste in movies.

reply

Maybe so, but at least their opinions are their own. Think about that, Mr. Whine.

reply

If ppl love it for its action, splatter and gore or 3D appearance, so be it.

On your list are titles you rated higher than the unimportant meta score.

---
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

LOl critics are *never* going to like a film like this - i'd hate to have the mind of a critic and be so up myself and arty farty.. really i would.. i am glad i am a mere human that can enjoy action romps from time to time.

And I did enjoy this for what it was, a fun OTT non stop action flick.

It wasn't my favourite underworld (those are 1 and 2) but i enjoyed it nonetheless.

Sorry your highness, that my taste in movies is not good enough for you. I am going to lose alot of sleep over that.

reply

It was bad, but still watchable! You could say the same about "Van Helsing!" Awful, but produced well with good "CGI!"

- - - http://scifiblogs3.blogspot.com/ - - - (Sci-fi Homage)

- - http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/ - DW & B's 7

reply

I kinda love Van Helsing, honestly. It's a great watch when I'm in a bad mood and just need something slightly ridiculous.

reply

the critics are more retarded than the general public

reply

Nah. I trust a critic a lot more than some random dumbass

reply

don't call yourself random dumbass

reply