You need to see The World at War, then. It is vastly superior, giving far more first-hand accounts (as it was done in the 70s, when more veterans were alive), and it looks at the war on all sides. It illustrates the background of the conflict, with the devastation of WWI, the Versaille Treaty requirements, the Depression, and the corruption that led to the rise of the Nazis. It also showcases the rise of militarism in Japan and its initial attacks in Manchuria. Meanwhile, it has segments that focus on the lives of the civilian populations, on both sides of the conflict and under occupation. It illustrates the Russian side of the war and the horrible toll on the Eastern Front. It gets into far greater detail about the decision to drop the atomic bomb and presents efforts within the Japanese government to bring about a peace, before the bomb was dropped, not to mention the toll that the conventional bombing campaign was having upon Japan's cities. It treats war as a human conflict, not just between nations.
This is at its best when we actually hear the veterans relate their stories, rather than the actors narrating. The words of Robert Sherrod do much to give context to the fighting in the Pacific and the horror of it, and their desire that the world learn from this horror. Far too much of that is lost these days when propaganda paints everyone in a uniform as a hero and war is presented as a video game, and World War II is presented as a battle between good and evil, rather than the failure to learn from the previous conflict and to act to stop greedy opportunists before they engulfed the world.
"Fortunately, Ah keep mah feathers numbered for just such an emergency!"
reply
share