The commentary explains why the movie isn't good

The movie was ok, for what it was. I mean when you get the idea, a R-rated body switch movie, it's not rocket science. The director is a totally Hollywood douche though. Listen to the comedy and he talks about the movie as if it's some deep, complex, satire or something. He talks about the movie, like he's selling it to the studio, which I get that you have to pump up a movie to execs, but when you're watching a movie where a baby craps in someone's face, it's not art.

And he keeps talking about making an R rated movie. How Richard Pryor was an inspiration to him. He obviously doesn't understand comedy at all. Richard Pryor used his comedy to talk about a lot of social and cultural problems. He used profanity as a way to rate these subjects to average audiences. This movie is rated R because they threw in nudity and cursing. They weren't making a satire, they were making a lame popcorn comedy. I mean the joke where the guy tells Bateman that he's dressed like a Jew. What the hell was that? It wasn't funny, you don't have any real payoff to the boss being racist. It was thrown in there to try to be "edgy". Same thing with the kid banging his head on the crib. It wasn't really funny and there was no real payoff. He stops doing it, why? Cause now the family it happy?

The movie was was it was. It could've been better, but what can you do?