Anybody actually seen this?
A 4.1 score from 37 users, no posts, no reviews. Can't be that bad that nobody can be bothered to type a few lines telling us what it's like.
shareA 4.1 score from 37 users, no posts, no reviews. Can't be that bad that nobody can be bothered to type a few lines telling us what it's like.
shareI just saw it, it was a good movie. I gave it a 6 out of 10.
Pulls you in, and have a storyline that keeps you guessing all the time whats going to happen next.
I just saw it. Fast screened the film in 20 minutes. Too much talking and not alot of action.
*Note to self...avoid movies that take place in the room of a hotel throughout the film*
[deleted]
I thought it was pretty good. Definitely 7/10. Some of the acting was very weak though.
---
I can see why some might like this and I can see what they were aiming for but ultimately it was too ponderous and too many scenes failed to ratchet up the tension you would expect. The stories they told, rather than reveal important information, destracted from the plot and messed the pace of the film. Too many times they missed what they were aiming for and fell short.
If the script and editing were tightier, this could have been a seven. But with the poor execution, on my scoring chart it is a four.
i agree with salmo, it could have been interesting, it had decent production value, but the pace was all out of wack
this is you - this is me -share
exactly, anybody actually seen this? because this movie is so bad. oh my gosh, this movie reeks of b-movie, second rate, cheap ass movie stink. it's so cheaply made that they basically only have 4 actors in the whole movie and they spend almost the entire movie in one room talking? I mean I don't care to watch a movie in which just has this and besides a few quick flashback scenes that's all we get. how boring and stupid and pointless and uninteresting. and the 4 characters are so boring and have no charisma and are the usual below average, b-movie quality characters.
share