I don't know much about Sinatra but MJ sure as hell had nothing to do
with pedophilia and it's obvious for anyone who actually reads the court
transcripts which revealed the true colors of his accusers.
The evidence is overwhelming to support his innocence.
Putting aside the obvious fact that both of his accusers admitted to
various people that MJ never touched them it's a matter of indisputable
fact that not one of them went to the police first, as true abuse victims
would , but instead went to a trial lawyer for advise about how to sue MJ
for millions.
Imagine if the Sandusky victims had done that one after another?
Wouldn't you find that strange?
Moreover, their story was often so absurd so full of contradictions and
lies that they were caught in numerous perjuries during cross-
examination.
For one thing the first kid claimed that he had oral sex with MJ and that
he was circumcised. But we now know thanks to the the autopsy report
that MJ was in fact NOT circumcised. Now, if anything, you would sure as
hell know that difference if you really performed oral sex on someone
especially if you are Jewish as the Chandlers were! That alone shows that
Jordan Chandler lied, period. Gavin Arvizo lied so often he should go into politics.
It's also interesting that among the many many people who actually
knew MJ for years and years not one came forward and said that they
saw him inappropriately behaving with kids. It's only those whom he
fired and therefore they had an ax to grind, or those who sued him or
were sued by him or those who didn't even meet him at all let alone
know him. Their words don't matter. They have no idea what MJ did and
didn't do. And no sane person would believe them.
Don't get me started on Wade Robson, who managed to contradict
himself on the very same day he accused MJ when he said it was not a
case of repressed memory at the same time if you read his lawsuit
documents there he claims having repressed memory because he knows
otherwise he has no chance of getting any money due to the statute of limitation. His story is the most absurd of all with some prophecy about
him becoming the next Spielberg, repressed memory, role playing
sessions, nervous breakdown BS. The classic case of a frivolous lawsuit
and of course, while claiming he doesn't do it for the money, he is actually suing the estate for $30 million dollar! Same old story. If you are broke simply accuse MJ of molesting you and hope for a settlement. It has become a sport.
You didn't know MJ, Sean Lennon, among many other kids, did.
Here's what he had to say about this whole child molestation nonsense:
"it's funny. People who think Michael is a diddler always assume that bought off the families of the kids he molested. You hear it all the time..But look at me. I was one of the kids he befriended at a young age. I may have spent more time with him than almost anybody else. I've seen all kinds of people speculate that he abused me. But I think
my family is actually richer than he is. So it would be quite a trick to buy me and my mother off. It's ridiculous. No way is Mike a child abuser. Take it from me. I knew the kids he knew. I would have known if anything funny was going on. "
So why in the world should we believe Gavin Arvizo whose family had a history of exploiting celebrities and suing and falsely accusing others for money (remember the JC Penney case) and not Lennon who has no financial motivation to say good things about MJ? Name one reason!
You can also here Dr. Wayne Dyer talking about MJ here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyCZ4x0cmmg
it pretty much sums up who MJ really was
reply
share