"im an important terrorist leader and im just gonna take a stroll out onto the perfectly staged balcony so our protagonist can take a perfectly ideal shot at me."
Yeah, I think that all of the OTHER people are scripted. The drug lord was told to do something stupid like that, but that doesn't mean that the opfor was in on it. I expect that guarding a non-mililtary person, especially an ego-maniacal drug lord, you have to expect something stupid like that. It is the opfor's fault for not keeping an eye on him.
I think others like the pilot, the scientist, the hostages, the aid convoy people, they were told basically how to behave, etc. And I think that the command guys are ready to throw new obstacles in his way, by changing mission parameters, and setting priorities (e.g., "You must get to the bridge and photograph the maps before completing any other objective." etc.) But I assume that the operators are represented fairly in that they really don't know what the other side is doing. I assume that this is common training for spec ops people.
I agree that some of the filler shots are clearly recreations, picking locks, running down a hill where there was no camera coverage, etc. But I think the "action" is real.
As far as the sniper shot being fake, I agree. The simunition web site says that their 5.56mm round is accurate to 30m, and I can't judge where he was but he seemed to be outside 30m. But, since the M4 is accurate up to 500m and this guy is a trained operator easily within 100m, perhaps they had agreed before-hand that if Willis got off any clean shot on the drug lord, that that would count as a kill, since it would have been such an easy kill in real life. I think that that would make sense in the sense of a simulation.
reply
share