Very Impressive!


To think I scoffed at all of the incredibly rave reviews and went into this film thinking it was just another ruse to entice people to fork out their cash for inferior goods, as it is somewhat of a common practice on this site. So set the reviews aside and read my unbiased opinion of the film.

So this is where I have come(as usual) to tell potential viewers who, like me, were/are skeptical after their first glance at this film and reviews for "The Last House" aka "House of Last Things", that this film is the real deal. Not just the real deal, but dare I say this is Michael Bartlett's masterpiece, it's a film which has been so finely tuned by this writer/director, likely over the many years since his last effort in 1998 the German film "The Little Girl Who Fell from the Tree"(I never heard of it either, but I've now added it to my WL). He has taken notice in the styles of many of the greats, like Lynch, Hitchcock and I especially felt a familiarity to Kubrick's "The Shining", and revisioned it into his own unique perspective. It is a bit exhausting to watch as the story slowly bores through your brain like that of a worm through the apple, but worth every bit imo. What it lacks in budget, it makes up for in style, with many subtle visual touches that weave through past and present, creating an uneasy and sort of supernatural atmosphere. Though heads up, it's a very cerebral film so if you like the kind of film where a bathroom break or a snack run won't ruin continuity then you should consider moving on. Or if you love a smart, well written indie thriller that leaves you guessing, then I highly recommend catching this if you can. 8.7/10



reply

You make this sound good, Killer. I might just have to watch it now as you've never gave me bad advice yet. My concern was that it might not be interesting enough, or have anything to hold my attention.

Thanks, man.

Titter Ye Not!

reply

Wow! Just finished it. Awesome flick.

Titter Ye Not!

reply

This was such an awful film. I don't understand what you guys liked about it. except for the girl which I thought was sexy.

reply

Did you watch the entire thing? I was ready to put it off by the end of the first act when it started to get interesting, and after that it got better and better. The chick was hot. Nice bod and smile.

Titter Ye Not!

reply

I compared tastes in ratings with Smooth Hector, it appears it's just a matter of different taste and overall experience. I believe I've seen more films in 2014 than the dudes has in all of time(not that it means anything in itself, but it is an indicator of sorts).

This film was not for everyone, but for those like us who see it all and have seen it all a million times, often bored to death drowning in formulaic dreck, this production really broke the mold in style. For a low budget indie it had some elements that we don't see very often.

For real film buffs this will be a hidden gem, I say hidden because sadly it doesn't seem to have any legs to it, nobody seems to be seeing it.

reply

It just got a distributed. It was shown at Cannes to an appreciative crowd this week, then got picked up. Old school like us know best!

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. Voltaire

reply

[deleted]

I'm just not that much of an IMDb participant so I only remind myself to rate something once in a while. I watch a lot of movies and I don't mind seeing some stinkers now and then.I'm a true omnivore so if you have any recommendations I'd sure love to hear them even though we might disagree on whether this is a good movie or not! I know I didn't think much of it.

reply

This was such an awful film. I don't understand what you guys liked about it. except for the girl which I thought was sexy.

They're just people who were involved with making the movie, trying to trick others into watching this pile of shít.

reply

Well, I wasn't involved in making this movie and I liked it. Just because you didn't like it doesn't mean that any good review must be written by someone who was involved in it.

reply

They're just people who were involved with making the movie, trying to trick others into watching this pile of shít.


Way off the mark my man, that would be the day when I give anything props which it did not deserve imho. Look at are ratings comparison for ffûckss sake, pretty damn similar and honestly if you actually looked at my profile before writing that absurd assumption than you truly must be severely brain dead.

Unfortunately like I already mentioned, some folks felt they needed to pad this film with shill reviews and normally when I see that for a film I rate it a one and don't even watch it because 99 outta 100 times it's gonna be a waste of time. This however was not. Agree to disagree, its all good.

reply

This film belongs in the art house garbage heap.

reply

That's the way sh!t goes sometimes with films, statistically our ratings are as close as they come with an even 20/20 split on the disagreeances. So even with very similar tastes there are going to be a few flicks that offer stuff that specifically appeals to only certain people or we would all be carbon copies of each other and everyone everywhere would love or hate everything in sync with no individuality whatsoever, a scary scenario indeed.

reply