Brian De Palma's Passion is the better film of the two
Just saw Love Crime after watching Passion and I tried to go into Love Crime realizing it would be different and not as stylized as Passion, but this movie just wasn't that good.
Love Crime is like a Euro soap opera: sterile, and poorly shot. While Love Crime and Passion have the same basic structure, the style, tone and execution are so drastically different.
Rachel McAdams and Noomi Rapace have better chemistry than the beautiful Ludivine Seigner and the talented Kristin Scott Thomas, Passion has a great musical score from Pino Donnaggio (love crime doesn't have a score at all), cinematography, suspense and most all...passion.
You really have a more fleshed out understanding of character motivation in Passion.
While Love Crime's basic plot structure is seen throughout Passion, De Palma built off that foundation and converted the story into a De Palma suspense/surrealistic thriller with a modern identity, very much set in world of today with the endless use of technology and how beneficial and destructive it can be.
I mean the split screen sequence with the ballet alone blows anything seen Love Crime.
Trust me guys, I really wanted to like Love Crime and if Passion didn't exist, I might not be so hard on it, but it's just so bland.
I suggest watching both films to see the differences, but for me De Palma's version is a great piece of filmmaking.
Love Crime is black coffee. De Palma's version adds the cream, sugar and a lot more.
Thoughts?