MovieChat Forums > The Haunting in Connecticut 2: Ghosts of Georgia (2013) Discussion > People saying this was bad, need to just...

People saying this was bad, need to just shut up and go watch Twilight.

posted 9 years ago by roselikeaboss
3 replies | jump to latest

After watching the first one, I thought it was a load of crap. When I heard a second one was being made I was hyped for it. The trailer worked.

Yes I understand that the title doesn't make sense, but just because it has a incomplete title, doesn't give you the right to knock the whole script/story.

I think they writers and directors probably didn't have a name for it,
so they decided to turn it into a sequel. Did it pay off? yes for me it did.

This is way better than the first because the endings between both of them
are different on many levels, A teenager finding a house filled with bodies, and setting them on fire. is just crap. this ending had more emotional feelings towards it. Just like any ghost story should...

Stop complaining about the title, and just enjoy it.

[–] ScottNichols 9 years ago

Yeah, the title worked on me, too, but not in a good way. Unlike you, I liked the first movie. The title hooked me into buying the second one. So yeah, I've got a bone to pick with the producers about the misleading title. FGS, it wasn't even filmed in Georgia!

Oh, what a waste of money and time. This was boring to the nth degree and not scary in the least. I did not grow to care for any of the characters. In fact, the girl's mother was such a b***h that she just p****d me off. I felt sorry for the husband, not because he had to deal with ghosts, but because he had to deal with her.

It was impossible to enjoy this flick. The only part of this DVD I enjoyed was the gag reel. But then, I always appreciate those because they illustrate my signature line on this board.

Actors do not have a job...they have a blast!

[–] king_of_bob 9 years ago

Yes I understand that the title doesn't make sense, but just because it has a incomplete title, doesn't give you the right to knock the whole script/story.

The title is complete, it just doesn't make any damn sense. There is NO connection to the first movie, so how the hell is this a sequel?

You are right though, the title itself isn't reason for us to rip apart the story. The poor writing on the other hand...

I think they writers and directors probably didn't have a name for it,
so they decided to turn it into a sequel. Did it pay off? yes for me it did.

First, they clearly did have a title. "Ghosts of Georgia." Second, as I just explained, this is NOT a sequel. There is 0 relation to the first movie, thus this cannot be considered an actual sequel.

Third, the fact that it worked for you is entirely irrelevant.

This is way better than the first because the endings between both of them
are different on many levels, A teenager finding a house filled with bodies, and setting them on fire. is just crap. this ending had more emotional feelings towards it. Just like any ghost story should...

You keep making statements of opinion as though that should mean anything to anybody. Not to mention "emotional feelings" is redundant. Go watch The Orphanage or The Devils Backbone for actually solid, emotional ghost stories.

Stop complaining about the title, and just enjoy it.

If the title were the only problem with the movie, that would be easy.

Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!

[–] gagirl048 9 years ago

I really liked the movie. Sure it was slow in some parts, but over all it was pretty good. I've heard about this family for years and seen other movies about their experiences, but this movie is one of the better ones.