Nudity hype?


So the calendar didn't actually end up being nude photos. So why would that one guy back out? They made so much hype about the guys getting naked and then in the end all they did was take their shirts off. Not that I wanted to see nudity, but it just made no sense after all the build up and all the trouble she took trying to convince all the guys to participate. Anybody else find that weird?

reply

[deleted]

Yeah the movie lied to us lol. And some of those guys were acting all nervous and all they did was come out in boxers or towels so why did they act that way when the wore what you would wear swimming or jogging lol. So I agree with you it was weird and totally misleading.

reply

I agree.It just happens to be a sexy calendar for men.

reply

TheArizonian2014: "I agree.It just happens to be a sexy calendar for men."

... calender of men ... NOT .... calender for men ...

Or, at least not FOR straight men. That's Playboy's job.

reply

ok i may be way off base, in fact i am sure i am but for some reason and i don't know why, i thought that guy was trans. IDK why. i missed part of it so, anyway that was what got stuck in my head.

__
Do everything in Love. I Corinthians 16:14 NIV

reply

Yes, there is no full nudity, but the pics are not bad. If you have the DVD, you can download the pics and make your own calendar. I like the blond mountain climber best.

reply

Yeah, I thought it was a full-monty sort of thing -- but then they were photoed in shorts.

reply