She wasn’t a hooker. All we see her do is give a pledge a lap dance before she’s pulled into a room to have sex with Paul. When Paul got on top of her and she started to refuse, she said “This isn’t what I do”, and in the conversation with her husband when he caught her in bed with another man, she said something along the lines of “I shouldn’t have stripped that night”---but I remember her saying “stripped”. So she was strictly a stripper. Secondly, even if she was a hooker, no still means no, stop still means stop, etc. etc.---I thought everyone learned this back in the 70s/80s.
Third, it’s true the frat boys didn’t give Paul much of a choice, but there is a point in the end of the fighting where he gets fed up and focuses all his anger towards the frat boys at Sandy (stripper) instead. I don’t believe he was a true rapist; I do believe he was somewhat forced in the beginning, but it ended up as a choice of his regardless because they weren’t forcing him anymore at that point. Maybe if they had been threatening him with a weapon the whole time, I would have said it was solely the frat boys' faults, but that wasn’t the case.
And for lowtek_forever’s comment, I of course don’t agree with you, but I believe it was more about the consequence of the rape rather than the rape itself. The fact that it caused Sandy to change to a point where her marriage (and I felt her, as well) was destroyed and unfortunately led to her and her husband’s (as well as that harmless bar guy's) demise. I know it seems stupid to say it was Paul’s fault Frank (the husband) murdered Sandy and that bar guy---of course that was Frank's own crime, and one we clearly see he had to prove redemption for since Paul was his “assignment”. But it was just about Paul’s careless actions being THE factor that changed the course of both Sandy and Frank’s lives to the point that it did. None of that would have happened if Paul hadn't raped her.
•¤ What can the damned really say to the damned? ¤•
reply
share