MovieChat Forums > In the Blink of an Eye Discussion > Censor or Dialog?

Censor or Dialog?

posted 13 years ago by dreisigma
3 replies | jump to latest

The atheist who has his review top and center apparently believes that censorship is the answer to anything we disagree with. The second point this film addresses is the possibility a rapture could be true. Just because it has never happened doesn't mean it never will. Atheists have faith there is no god because they cannot prove it. Science is based on faith.

Kurt Godel (1906-1978)
Incompleteness Theroem

Erwin Schrödenger (1887-1961)
Indeterminacy Theroem

Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976)
Uncertainty Principle

Get the picture? The more we discover, the more we find we don't know.

Anyone who claims to know there is no god must be capable of searching everywhere inside and outside the universe, throughout time (aka omnipresent). Therefore, that person would claim to BE god. One might say there is a negligible probability there is a god. There is also a negligible probability that this universe had a random beginning, yet evolutionists believe it anyway.

[–] ih8tt 13 years ago

Just because it has never happened doesn't mean it never will.

exactly, if it had already happened, this would all be a moot point

Get the picture? The more we discover, the more we find we don't know.

we don't have any idea what and how much we don't know

Anyone who claims to know there is no god must be capable of searching everywhere inside and outside the universe, throughout time (aka omnipresent). Therefore, that person would claim to BE god.

with how arrogant, self-righteous, and insulting to people of faith so many Atheists are, I agree with you completely

IMHO, the most logical, i.e., 'scientific' opinion, is to be an Agnostic, to openly state that you don't know whether or not there is a God, but that you don't completely dismiss the possibility, but that requires way too much humility for most Atheists

One might say there is a negligible probability there is a god. There is also a negligible probability that this universe had a random beginning, yet evolutionists believe it anyway.

exactly, there's a reason it's still called the Theory of Evolution, because, in the century or so since it was published, many holes have been poked in it, and it has far from been proven completely true

[–] phydaux36 13 years ago

Actually, Scripture tells us that both Elijah and Enoch were taken from the earth and did not experience death, similar to the concept of the Rapture in today’s bible prophecy. So the idea that it could happen is a real possibility.
Hebrews 11:5
By faith Enoch was taken from this life, so that he did not experience death; he could not be found, because God had taken him away. For before he was taken, he was commended as one who pleased God.
2 Kings 2:11-12
As they were walking along and talking together, suddenly a chariot of fire and horses of fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind. 12 Elisha saw this and cried out, “My father! My father! The chariots and horsemen of Israel!” And Elisha saw him no more. Then he took hold of his own clothes and tore them apart.

[–] M_Qtips 10 years ago

Straw man arguments. These comments show a clear lack of understanding of both atheism and science.