MovieChat Forums > YellowBrickRoad (2010) Discussion > Don't let the negative reviews stop you!

Don't let the negative reviews stop you!


This is a killer flick!

(mild ending spoilers ahead)

The reason people dislike this movie so much seems to stem from it's lack of a nice solid "this is exactly why" resolution. It's ambiguous.

I'll agree it would have been cool to get a nice "there's a evil witch in the woods" or "a portal to some hellish dimension" or "secret 40's cult of dixieland jazz loving satanists" unquestionable type of ending. It would have absolved that sense of wanting to what what exactly is going on. And, it is in fact that very sense that pushes you toward the end of the film. The plot is very intriguing and question-raising.

But we don't get that. Instead we get some metaphorical return to the beginning. I'm not going to go into why I think the ending was good right now, because I'm tired, but I will say that (and this is coming from a cynical movie viewer, I'm good at finding things to not like a bout a movie) this is just killer horror/mystery. The acting is good, the script is good, the cinematography is good, and the pacing is good.

If you're on edge about whether to see this, forget the people who don't like not having everything spelled out for them, and watch this movie!

reply

It's not like the detractors are asking to be spoon-fed an ending. It's just that with such an investment and the story's synopsis we'd just like to see something that resembles a connection between the components in order to make it a story rather than a sequence of random images and sounds. I love the set, the acting was great and the set-up for the story is what drew me in.

But for the love of god, make a story out of it. Everything was there with which to do it. So why didn't it happen?

But I agree- don't let the negative reviews dissuade you from seeing this. It truly IS an experience.



"Atlas Shrugged- Part 2"- Coming in 2012! --The saga continues!

reply

[deleted]

I agree. Besides the road "starting" at the theater, there didn't seem to be a connection made with the theater. There needed to be a build up to it. Overall, I liked it and thought it was really original and mostly well-done, but I felt like it needed a script revision. It felt as if the script wasn't quite finished.

reply

You didn't get the connection between the theater and all the Wizard of Oz references? Hmmm...that was a dead giveaway to me.

reply

i understood the movie just fine, but i still didn't like it. i felt like it was an overly ambitious effort from amateur film-makers. i think they wanted to make a certain style of film and even had a decent premise, but the execution was just poor.

reply

[deleted]

I AGREE
I avoided this film for weeks because of negative reviews on this board.
Someday I'll realize that people love to complain more than they like to praise - which is why the internet is filled with complaints, bad reviews, and negativity.

Anyway, yellowbrickroad is completely original and best of all it's SCARY!
You know how certain movies just stay with you for awhile? That creepy, uneasy feeling? It's that kind of movie.
The people that dislike yellowbrickroad are the same that dont like Donnie Darko because they don't understand it. And its "weird"

reply

There seems to be 3 types of people with opinions on Yellowbrickroad - The junkies, the misconcepted and the ones with a dark sense of humor. I guess the latter can have some fun about it and will be sure not to ask men to remove their hats. The junkies are going to crack up on mescaline and have trippy slumberparties with a bunch of shr00ms and a talking caterpillar and the people who totally have misunderstood this film will raise it to the skies.

Personally I think the junkies are correct, it does look like a bad trip followed by mass psycosis, something that would have worked smoothly with a government LSD Behaviour experiment plot. That could have justified all the extremely badly executed over the top kills explaining it as being blown out of proportion by the drugs. It would also have been referred to in the scene when the team tries to explain the music.

The common misunderstanding that this film is good is that people look at the acting. And that is no misconception - the acting is excellent. The plot however is lousy. Another way to mistake this film for being a good piece of art is observing the footage, camera, angles and color filters. Also wery good. The dusky faded grey filter is a pleasure for the eye to watch and it dowses the actors. But the film in itself is still not good. It is actually quite a waste of time and money. And not to mention the credibility for the actors. Negative ratings and rewievs ALWAYS hit the actors the most. And that can easily grow to a stigmata creating a false image for the actor that they have low acting skills when the fault really lies with the directing team, first filming the actors and later cutting up the production to something completely pointless and horrid.

I had high expectations for Yellowbrickroad. I don't give a flying frak about reviews, I care for the result. And the outcome in this case was another dissapointment, watching great acting being shredded to pieces by incredibly incapable directing.

The film might have sounded better in the script. But it is extremely poorly executed. The end feels more like a Shining ripoff then the "End of the Yellowbrickroad" The kill scenes are redicoulous. Ripping of legs? Tearing up jaws? Come on. There is absolutely nothing that justifies that awfulness and the only way it could have been explained would have been that they all were hallucinating. Since they weren't it's just lame. And it tore down the serious aura set by the actors. Not in their favor.

The entire film goes on without getting to the point and you just count down the time of it ever having a shot of getting there.

So it is a clear misunderstanding to belive that this film is a great piece of art. It is a poor film with good actors. If you want to watch a brilliant horrorflick with one of the participating actors you should tune in to "The Signal" (The Terminus Signal) THAT is excellent filmmaking WITH great acting NOT being "spoonfed" to you. Skew is an interesting indie piece wich makes you think

And. I am sorry. But Donnie Darko is an awful film. It is so bad it should recive an award. It's tragic that people have gone all wanky about the Passenger Rabbit suit and blindly pushes it to be a film that "only a few understands"

It's an incredibly sh*tty film and Jake Gyllenhaal is a shame, it is amazing how he ever could get into the acting biz if you look at his horridly lacking performance. And you sure can compare to sister Maggie Gyllenhaals way better performance. Jake Gyllenhaal's part in Donnie Darko is not far from the same lacking part he had in the timewasting war-non-action film Jarhead. I was surprised and pleased to watch End of Watch at the cinema seeing him improved to a good actor. I never thought that would happen. Glad to be proven wrong in that case. But it doesn't change the fact that Donnie Darko is a lousy film, bad script, redicoulus, extremely sex and violent fixated juvenile mono - and dialouges, inconsistency and the only action actually happening at the end of the movie. It's D'erenlicté and nothing else.

If you really want to watch things wich are complex to understand take a sit down and try to manage Primer. Or enjoy a young Rufus Sewell in Dark City if you like the flashback to the past. Or go for the obscure piece Brainscan if you want old school darkness. Or what the heck - Take some LSD and watch Space Jam in a Frank suit, that might just do it.

And just about the time I am coming out of jail, hopefully you'll be coming our of your coma

reply

I completely agree on every point. Nothing about this or DD are deep or difficult to understand.

reply

Indeed it isn't.

However - With better directors, scriptwriters and budgets there could be something interesting to make of them. YBR COULD be a much better film.

Just look at Jake Gyllenhaal, I know I ranted on about him there but take a look at Prisoners wich is a more recent film. The man is great in that role.

Sometimes things are better to lie and wait for a while, James Cameron had written Avatar ands wanted to shoot the film right after Titanic - Aren't we glad he waited!?

And just about the time I am coming out of jail, hopefully you'll be coming our of your coma

reply

i hate him with a passion, but he was great in Zodiac also.

I didn't like avatar apart from the visuals. It was better the first time i saw it when it was called Ferngully or Dances with Wolves.

YBR very much could have been lots better.

reply

That guy makes me itch and not in a good way so he really does need to work hard to impress me and in some films he actually has, so at least there are some improvement.

lol, I know that Ferngully have gotten a lot of bad rewievs especially since some of the charachters are cheap copies from other films but I still loved it when I saw it as young.

But imagine HOW bad Avatar would have been if it had been made right after Titanic? It would have made that ship roll over in it's watergrave and sink again!

And just about the time I am coming out of jail, hopefully you'll be coming our of your coma - Casino

reply

My point was ferngully and avatar are essentially the same movie.

reply

I know, I got that.

And just about the time I am coming out of jail, hopefully you'll be coming our of your coma

reply

"The entire film goes on without getting to the point and you just count down the time of it ever having a shot of getting there."

That statement really resonates with me lol, I just finished watching this movie, after seeing someone recommend it on another board.. The board for Devil's Pass actually, which IMO is actually a pretty decent movie. Hell, I liked this movie until I became absolutely certain it was leading nowhere. The ending just fell completely flat for me. This movie is not great.. Which really is too bad because the acting was quite good.

reply

^I fully agree

I also believe no matter how great a movie is there will always be a bunch of people on IMDB trying to trash it. Thats life. I loved this movie.

reply

Also, a lot of movie reviewer dislike the horror film genre. I've seen several horror movies that were pretty good or at least not bad, and yet reviewers seem to dislike them simply because they were horror films.

reply

I dont even understand what isnt explained. It all ties together nicely
for me. I wonder if people were drinking when they watched it.

reply

So nobody sees any correlation that, at the end of a movie about the destructive extent of human curiosity and the dangers of "reaching for things you'll never understand" ends with little explanation or closure? The character's in the movie never seem to quit laying out the underlying message. You either had to make the decision to turn back, or risk reaching the end of the path with nothing to show for it.

reply

I'm glad i read this post, i saw the IMBD score, and was about to dismiss it, but i have had my mind changed by what ive read in the posts here, i love strange movies which dont spoon feed you every step of the way, so i think ill actually give this one a chance, thanks!

reply

"The acting is good, the script is good, the cinematography is good, and the pacing is good."

The acting is poor, the script is awful, the cinematography is amateurish and the pacing is as captivating as waiting at the dentist office.

Got get pickled some more.

reply

[deleted]

"The acting is poor, the script is awful, the cinematography is amateurish and the pacing is as captivating as waiting at the dentist office."

Couldn't agree more. This movie tries to be complex and ambiguous, but the people behind this crap just don't have the talent for that.

People don't hate this movie because they want to be spoon fed, people hate it because it sucks. To the OP, I love movies like PRIMER, MULHOLLAND DRIVE, DONNIE DARKO... so don't give me that "people didn't like it because they didn't get it" bs.

reply