Rated at 6.2? How on earth?
There are movies that I really like that are less than 6.2. I just don't understand how it could be just two-tenths or so away from something like the Godfather.
shareThere are movies that I really like that are less than 6.2. I just don't understand how it could be just two-tenths or so away from something like the Godfather.
shareGranted the film wasn't anywhere near as good as the first one, but I think you could give it a 5 or 6 just based on the Liam Neeson kicking ass scenes alone.
I just watched it. It was horrible. 4/10
shareI just watched it. It was horrible. 4/10
The story sucks the acting is bland and boring to watch and worst of all, the action is filmed in such an amateurish and incomprehensible manner, so you have no idea what is going on!
shareThere are movies that I really like that are less than 6.2. I just don't understand how it could be just two-tenths or so away from something like the Godfather.The Godfather is at 9.2... share
Yeah what's the OP talking about? This has a D, Godfather has an A. Sounds about right. What more do they want?
"What? Do you wanna just sit around and be wrong?" - Liz Lemon
I like Liam Neeson very much. Taken was a good movie and I gave it 8/10. But taken 2 was a disappointment, with a poor plot and so many unacceptable mistakes. 3/10, this is what I gave Taken 2.
share[deleted]
8/10 from me; I think it actually underrated in all honesty. Its not as good as the first (or as emotional), but it still delivers its share of awesome moments, and I liked Rade Sherebedaga as the main antagonist Murad (thought it was a nice touch having him be related to Marco, the main kidnapper from the first).
"Speak of the Devil, and He shall appear."
7.5 for me
share[deleted]