It's just racist hollywood, plain and simple.
Stephen King kind of made me wonder why he didn't make Mike a successful character in his book.. Mike was the "custodian" and left to tend the house, so to speak.. while everyone else went abroad and each one was successful.
I, too, hope they switch the roles in the Sequel. At first, i thought, the reason why the history was given to Ben was because maybe the actor who played Mike probably might not have been convincing enough in the monologue or the scene in the library. But it was obvious the director used Ben to steer the characters over to his place to look at the history. As well as play-up the embarrassment of the New Kids on the Block with Beverly.. (which was actually pretty funny..)
Don't know if the director was queezy about showing the world a bunch of white kids being educated by a black kid. Let alone going over to his house in the movie. To be honest, it's a possibility the director had no clue how african americans in general, actually lived in small towns, back in the 80's or the 90's for that matter. Instead of doing the research, he probably just made it easier for himself, as well as the audience. Gawd knows the director didn't want the snow flakes to be uncomfortable. They're the biggest box office draw, world-wide.
reply
share