The Achilles Heel of 9/11 Conspiracy Debunkers

source: http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/Conspiracies.htm

The Achilles heel of 9/11 conspiracy debunkers

In their indefensible position, all the conspiracy debunkers have done is continually argue that the fire was hot enough to weaken the steel, and leave it at that, while totally ignoring the fact that weakening (or melting) the steel would NOT have caused the 500,000 ton structure beneath the fire and impact point to collapse at near free fall velocity as though it suddenly became weightless. One cannot simply turn 500,000 tons into near 0. A small portion of a skyscraper cannot simply plummet through most of the structure as though it weren’t there. More specifically, the top 10 floors cannot smash through the 100 floors below it as if it were air with no resistance. Get real. This is a key fact that conspiracy debunkers cannot deal with, so they simply block it out of their minds and try to change the subject. Thus it is their Achilles heel, as mentioned earlier.

In regard to Building 7, the same applies. The conspiracy debunkers continually argue that the fires in WTC7 were hotter than conspiracists claim, based on firefighter reports and photos that show large fires in the building. But again, they are missing the key point. It doesn’t matter whether the fires in Building 7 were small or large. Either way, it could not account for the collapse features and speed. Even a raging inferno could not have brought the Building down at near free fall velocity in an asymmetrical collapse. Other skyscrapers which were consumed by raging infernos for much longer, such as the Windsor Tower in Madrid the Cultural Center in Beijing, and WTC5 on 9/11, did not result in a collapse.

Another argument they use is to say that Building 7 was built in a way that caused it to collapse easily. But this is not supported by any data nor does it make sense. It defies common sense logic too. Building 7 housed many important government offices and was located in the heart of the financial center of America, where the elites operated in. Why would it have been designed so poorly, especially in the United States, which boasts the best architectural designs? More likely, this building was designed with the best materials and foundation, and could only have been brought down in some controlled manner. So you see, such arguments are grasping at straws from an indefensible position.

When confronted with this dilemma, the conspiracy debunkers and proponents of the official story resort to cognitive dissonance by blocking it out altogether, because they simply can’t deal with it, which speaks volumes about the invalidity of their case.

2 Questions that will blow away any 9/11 conspiracy denier

Here are 2 simple common sense questions that will blow away any 9/11 conspiracy denier:

1) If an entire skyscraper can be destroyed and pulverized into dust by fire in a few hours, like what happened on 9/11, then why do demolition companies need a few months to rig a skyscraper with explosive charges to bring it down? Wouldn't they be out of business since all that trouble could be saved by just lighting a few floors on fire for a few hours?

2) When you use a gas stove to cook in your kitchen, the blue flame that comes out is actually hotter than the fires at the WTC on 9/11. So why then doesn’t your entire kitchen range collapse at free fall speed and turn into dust and shatter into tiny pieces? Try leaving it on for hours and see if the kitchen range collapses. The WTC was composed of steel core columns and steel frames, which are much stronger than your kitchen range. So why would it collapse while your kitchen range wouldn’t? Likewise, when you barbecue on a grill stand outside using burning coals, why doesn’t the entire grill stand collapse at free fall speed?

Such simple questions will flabbergast any 9/11 conspiracy denier into shock and denial. The common sense logic will simply overwhelm them. Ask them to meditate on these questions. They may help remove the emotional/psychological block that prevents them from accepting the obvious conclusion that 9/11 had to be an inside job of some sort.

Must see 9/11 films, available on YouTube:

– “Zero: An Investigation into 9/11” – The best one, flows smoothly and is easy to understand. Must see!
– “9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out” – The most credible film, featuring 50+ architects, engineers and scientists. Must see!
– “9/11 Blueprint for Truth” – Very scientific and rational, presented by professional architect and founder Richard Gage.
– “9/11 Mysteries” – Easy to understand, points out many discrepancies with unwavering logic.
– “Zeitgeist: The Movie” – One of the most popular awakening documentaries on the internet. Covers the Jesus myth, 9/11 and New World Order agenda.
– “9/11 Coincidences” – Great series on YouTube and very informative.
– “9/11 Painful Deceptions” – By Eric Hufschmid, based on his book “Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack”.
– “Operation Terror” – 9/11 conspiracy dramatization by director Art Olivier, banned from theaters.
– “Conspiracy Theory” with Jesse Ventura, see the 2 earth shattering episodes on 9/11