MovieChat Forums > The Hunger Games (2012) Discussion > When will Suzanne Collins admit she was ...

When will Suzanne Collins admit she was inspired by Battle Royale?


I'm not saying she ripped it off. But to deny that she has never even heard of it before writing The Hunger Games is hard to believe. Especially sense both of the sequels are about rebelling against the government. They aren't exactly the same movie because the plots aren't the same point by point. But there is many similarities including a love story, volunteers, tracking devices, corrupt government, and even a weirdly dressed lady giving a speech.

reply

There are many other threads about this. She said she had inspirations from Greek mythology. She said she never heard of it, I have no way of knowing for sure, but I believe her. Just because the stories are similar does not mean she's lying, so you have no reason to be so certain of it.

reply

[deleted]

If these movies are good enough to be remade, they're good enough to stand on their own. If audiences are too racist or stupid to watch these Asian movies in their original format, then *beep* 'em. That said, this website also sucks.

reply

[deleted]

still telling the same joke I see.

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

reply

How is BR's dominance over the Hunger Games considered to be a joke? The Hunger Games is enjoying its popularity now, and the studios are milking it to the last drop, but where will it be, say, 10 years from now?

reply

A well respected film series and great books.

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.

reply

Battle Royale 2 wasn't based on a book though, the script was written by Norio Kida and director Kenta Fukasaku, whose father Kenji was the acclaimed director who did Battle Royale (sort of his swansong, if you will - using characters from Takami Kousun's original masterpiece, which wasn't divied up into three volumnes to triple profits.

reply

This movie is nothing more than a rehashed of the 2000 film. If this movie is in an academic world, it will get an "F" for plagiarism.

reply

There have been hundreds (if not thousands) of inventions that were simultaneously invented by more than one person; including the cotton gin, the radio, using electricity, light bulbs, and the telephone, where the inventors had no idea someone else was working on the project. The names in the history books though are the "first" ones to patent their ideas. The point is - it happens every day when someone comes up with something they think is unique but someone else, somewhere else, has already thought of it.

reply

This was an exact duplicate. Corrupt government forces strangers to kill each other-it's really only been done once before way back in the ancient times of 2000. BR was the first but HG won't be the last. If HG plagiarized, BR did not, and neither did BR's predecessor, because there wasn't one....

reply

It's widely accepted that the whole Games are a ripoff of Battle royale. The Hunger Games is really just a vessel for the character study of Katniss as she goes through and emerges from intense trauma anyway, and since I haven't read Battle Royale I can't comment on how similar that element of it is, but the Games are totally a ripoff.

reply

Completely False. The Huger Games exist in an alternate universe, one in which Japan won WWII, although I'm not so sure the author realizes it. It may even be said that Panem is a land in an entirely other dimension.

reply

since she wasn't inspired by Battle Royale, I doubt she will ever say such a thing.

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

reply

but you state that as if fact, when in fact, you have not a clue

reply

considering the BR book and film was not available to her when she wrote THG, it is very doubtful BR was a source of inspiration. I think that is as near a fact as can be found.

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

reply

Pete, you're messing with that poor little BR fan's (translation-troll) head. You know they don't know what a fact is.

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.

reply

no but they are very good at telling joke. everything they say is a laugh a minute

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

reply

Can't argue with that.
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so. And I have groupies, Atomic Girl said so.

reply

They say imitation is the highest form of flattery, but this is ridiculous. There are a lot of sides to a parable as complex as Battle Royale, and I suspect that Ross may have wanted to explore them. Instead the studio forced him into sticking to a cheap imitation of the popular Japanese classic. Tatsuya Fujiwara turned in a performance that lead to one of the most memorable characters in film history and it would have been impossible for any actor, no matter how good to recreate that. The rest of the characters are stuck just as tight to similarly wooden imitations of the originals. It is almost painful to watch very talented actors (namely Donald Sutherland) have that talent stifled.

reply

It's the same with Collins. She spouts a lot of nonsense about her influences with the arrogance of believing that people are too stupid to know that she's full of it. For example, claiming that the gladiator games inspired Hunger Games. She assumes people don't know anything about ancient history, don't know that the gladiator games had nothing to do with hunting, had nothing to do with innocent civilians being dragged against their will into an arena to hunt each other down until one was left standing. It was a professional sport--like boxing, wrestling, MMA, etc.--in which trained athletes fought in an arena.

reply

Considering the BR book and film was not available to her when she wrote THG, it is very doubtful BR was a source of inspiration. I think that is as near a fact as can be found.


How about these facts?

Battle Royale book publication date: 1999

Battle Royale film premier date: 2000

Battle Royale 2 film sequel premier date: 2003

first Hunger Games book appears: 2008



Oh dear it looks like you were completely wrong

reply

and all these have been refuted numerous times. they are irrelevent.

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

reply

Well that's what happens when a book is not sold in mainstream bookshops and sticks pretty closely to the Wapanese marketplace. It's a tiny demographic. It's also what happens when a movie doesn't get a general release in a country. What can you do years after this book/film sinks like a stone? You whine.

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply

still laughing @ summeriris

reply

Well I can take it. Glad to be of service, we must all try and help those who are less fortunate than ourselves. Try and remember to come in out of the rain.

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply

[deleted]

It is not unrealistic that two or more artists develop essentially the same idea independently. Actually, it is hard to believe that this occurs rarely. In science, this happens all the time. And I don't mean only rather similar idea. A little anecdote from an engineer friend of mine: he is writing his doctorate about a new crystaline arrangement for a translucent solid (widely known as glass, though chemically way beyond SiO2), but this is only because his professor beat another professor from Japan to the punch in registering the discovery, very close to the proverbial split second. The similarities are striking, to be sure, but that's all.

reply

thats because u are researching facts, if einstein didn't come up with e=mc2 some else would of.

to quote another user

"At least the author of Battle Royale admits Lord of the Flies existence. And even pays homage to it in the book, along with other influences like Stephen King who wrote The Running Man.

Collins apparently never saw a movie, read a book or even had access to the internet in her life, popped her head out of the sand one day and wrote HG. "

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I believe there was a time difference of a few years between them. And again, Battle Royale was very cult/niche in North America (so was Hunger Games for at least a few years).

If Harry Potter hadn't blown up, then followed by Twilight...Hunger Games probably never would have made it to the screen.

On a lighter note, where are all these rabid Battle Royale fans on message boards for films that blatantly ripped off "Alien" or "Star Wars" or any other successful film.

And on a final note, I've read Battle Royale and I own a copy. It's a very good read. But you don't see me bitching about this. Because one, Hunger Games isn't a blatant copy, and two, why would anyone get so worked up over it?

This isn't like The Asylum did a Z grade knockoff of BR and called it "Skirmish Royale". HG's is a well made movie with a very good cast. And I'll say again, BR fans should be THRILLED Hgs exists cause it gives BR even more attention.

"America isn't ready for a gay, mexican chicken sandwich"

reply

[deleted]

Please, explain the plots in terms that are not simplistic. Because these are not simplistic books unless you are deliberately trying to ignore the underlying themes. So go ahead, explain what Takami was trying to write about, explain what Collins was writing about. And try to stay away from the comic book black/white explanation. I'm really interested in seeing if you can get under the surfce of either book and can discuss it without mentioning the films. And while you are discussing the books be sure to use the expanded version of Takami's book, you know the one he wrote after THG was published.

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply

Your logic is flawed . I have never heard of Battle Royale before all of this and I am fairly well read, watch a lot of movies and definately surf the net. You seem to think Japanese movie are a bigger deal in American mainstream society than they actually are.

reply

Well, In Japan, there isn't much of an audience for films shown in theaters, and TV work has always been considered more prestigious among actors and actresses, (it's becoming the same in the hollywood) so Japanese films are created more for a world market, in that sence they are a bigger deal as their popular is more far-flung, of course hollywood has that market cornered but sometimes a film is only popular amond a certain demographic in it's home nation, the hunger games is a one such prime example.

(>^_(>O_o)>

reply

but sometimes a film is only popular amond a certain demographic in it's home nation, the hunger games is a one such prime example.

'The Hunger Games: Catching Fire' says hello.

reply

What is this Battle Royale you speak of? I've never heard of it. Why would you think Hunger Games is related to this weird battle of yours?

reply

That's a hard question for the typical BR troll to answer. 'Battle Royale' was published before 'The Hunger Games' in Japan. The first version was very badly translated and did not sell well. The rewritten and re-translated book was published after THG. It still has not sold well. It is the story of a DeathMatch between the members of a class Japanese students. No one know why exactly, but it seems a lot of students were cutting classes. It is a pretty good book, each student's death scene is done in detail. We learn who each student is and how they die. It gets repetitive but there are over 40 students in the class. There was a film made and it was never released in North America, but this fact like the fact the book didn't sell does not stop the BR trolls from screaming rip-off. Why, who knows?
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply

you havent a clue as to what you are talking about. NETFLIX had it available for rent years ago, it was always hard to reserve…it was so popular….also Amazon.com had it for sale as an import…word got out among those who were aware of film and Japanese movies

reply

THG was written in 2007, you know for sure that Netflix had a film that wasn't legally released in North America for rent at that time? Because I remember very well when Tarantino gave his interview about the film and he bemoaned the fact that you couldn't get in the US or Canada...anywhere. Now I did try to get it on Netflix in the UK in March 2012. I had booked till June and it was marked 'Unavailable at this time'. I gave up and watched it on YouTube which left a lot to be desired. Sometimes it was available and sometimes it was marked, 'This content is blocked.' And if anyone went to Amazon to get that film, that means that Amazon was selling an illegal film. But you can't prove this in any way. This is like the BR troll who posted that he saw the film in a theatre in 2002, the big problem was that that theatre was not built till 2009. The fact is that only bootleg (illegal) copies of the film was available tille 2012 in the US. This is fact, not a dream made up to try and bolster an opinion. The book was sold by Amazon and specialty bookshops. And the manga was released in 2007. Unfortunately Collins had already started to write her novel by then. Amazon is very good at published the dated books and film were released, the release dates are right up there. Do you ever even think about checking them out?

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply

[deleted]

people in the know have been renting Battle Royale for years now….perhaps Collins bet on its being both a cult film here, AND from Japan gave herself permission to copy it, revise it, and add a few things to make it seem different. She knows which block the Bank Vault is located on

reply

What people and what rental shops? Name one legal shop in the US that rented out a film that had not been legally released in the US?

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply

[deleted]

I'm afraid Battle Royale beats out Yimou Zhang's 'Hero' by far. On 2003, Battle Royale was re-released on VHS and released on DVD for the first time, titled Battle Royale: Platinum Edition, as part of Toei's Platinum Edition line of classic DVDs. Battle Royale was first released on VHS and laserdisc in the United States on March 3, 2001, under Toei's "Masterpiece Collection" video series. In addition, Deluxe Editions of both formats were released. The VHS Deluxe Edition included the film, an exclusive lithograph of Shuya and Noriko (in some editions), a commemorative "Beato" epigraph, six concept art lithographs, another tape with the half-hour TV show The Making of Battle Royale, and a certificate of authenticity. The CAV laserdisc Deluxe Edition also contained the film, six concept art lithographs and The Making of Battle Royale, and added storyboards, character design artwork, concept art, rough animation, and a directors' commentary that the VHS edition did not have, on a total of four double sided discs. The VHS tape quickly became the best-selling Asian videotape of all time: 2.5 million tapes were sold on the first day and ultimately sales totaled more than 30 million before these home video versions went into moratorium in 2005. While Hero does count as a distant second it preformed not nearly as well as the Battle Royale phenomenon!

reply

She will never admit to being "inspired by" anything because according to her official story she came up with a Xerox copy of Battle Royale's premise by reading certain noble texts pertaining to Greco-Roman mythology. Sorta like if you ripped off Star Wars but claimed that you came up with idea from reading something that no one could deny was in the public domain, like Shakespeare, or the plays of Ovid, for example.

reply

But the Greco-Roman inspiration is right there in the book. There is nothing even close to a bunch of schoolchildren being punished for playing hooky being carted off to an island for a big playground style battle with automatic weapons. If you are going to scream rip-off you could at least quote something that was original in BR that came even close to being ripped off. You can't say the Deathmatch, that's been done to death and you can't say children because that's been done since the Theseus myth.

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply


Uhhhh... I can say "Death Match with Children" as the first time that was done was with Battle Royale (2000). There was a deathmatch in Theseus but it was against the Minotaur, a monster with a human body and the head of a bull.

Nice try, though...



reply

I can say "Death Match with Children" as the first time that was done was with Battle Royale (2000).

And I'm hearing that BBC covered it first.

reply

You have difficulty understanding how inspiration works don't you. Theseus supplied the theme of the sacrifice of children in reparation for an old crime, the Ancient Roman world supplied inspiration for names of characters and the Deathmatch theme. Reality TV nof today inspired the theme of an entire nation watching the Games and the celebrity hyping of the Tributes, and the Iraq war inspired the war element of revolution. The American Revolution inspired the aftermath of another country with 13 States. That's what a creative person does, they take many themes and inspirations and mix them up and then they have their own unique take on it. This is where you are confused, Takami did not give his story it's own unique setting. He borrowed the theme of children being sacrificed (from Stephen King, not Greek Myths) but he couldn't go beyond that to imagine an original world and he couldn't give them a story beyond the Deathmatch. For him the story ended when the students died and the world of the book is his world of Modern day Japan. A severe lack of imagination.

_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply

But the students in BR were not children. They were teenagers on the verge of adulthood.
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.

reply


interesting you select Staw Wars for your example. in Star Wars the Death Star was a sphere with a two thousand kilometer circumfrance. In Doc. Smith's The Skylark of Valeron" the ship was a sphere with a two thusand kilometer circumfrance. the Skylark book was written 60 plus years before Star Wars. so who plagerized who.
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

reply

This whole thing is silly. I had never heard of Battle Royale until I came to these message boards. I saw that the movie was available to view on Netflix, so I did. Beyond a very basic premise, the comparison with THG is remote. Most ideas have been done in some form in the past. "12 Years a Slave" is a copy of "Roots". "The Wolf of Wall Street" is a copy of "Wall Street". Every zombie movie is just copying another zombie movie. What about romantic comedies? Did you see the one where two apparent opposites get together, have a little fight, but then reconnect at the end? Sheesh! That's called every romantic comedy!!!

The idea here is basically that a government makes teens fight to the death with a lone survivor. That's about it. Sure, you can inevitably find a few more similarities if you look hard enough. Yes, they both have trackers. Yes, they both have a control room. Sheesh, that's hardly a stretch given the premise There's over 7 billion people on the planet. It's almost inevitable that some have the same ideas. Heck, I remember thinking that it would be a good movie if a bunch of the British royalty were tragically killed and a goof ball American was made King of England. Not long afterwards, they made "King Ralph". Why don't I just sue them for taking MY idea? I also thought a graduation party would be a good idea for a teen movie. They later made "Can't Hardly Wait". Oh yeah, and that movie includes a nerd, a jock, a sensitive guy and a beautiful girl. Seriously, it happens, particularly when you talk about vague movie ideas and 7 billion people on this planet.

The differences between these two movies are HUGE. This isn't a complete list, but just a few things off the top of my head:

1. The characters are completely different. (Unless you go super vague and say good guys versus bad guys, but that's every movie.)

2. THG is set in the future. BR is set in the present.

3. THG is set in North America. BR is set in Japan.

4. The law in THG is to suppress the Districts. The law in BR is designed to influence the youth.

5. THG deals with class differences (i.e, the poor of District 12 in comparison to the capital). BR doesn't make any class references.

6. Although both use random selection, the method is very different. BR selects a random class of students. THG selects random individuals (a boy and a girl) from each of the 12 Districts.

7. THG deals with the theme or revolution. BR doesn't.

8. THG is a commentary on America's obsession with reality television. BR isn't even on television.

9. THG is a commentary on big government. (The people's only real choice is to work for "Capitol Coal".) BR doesn't touch the subject.

10. THG is in a dome. BR is on an island.

11. In THG, a significant part of the story involves the training. (The game itself doesn't even start until THG movie is half over.) Other than a short instructional video, training doesn't exist at all in BR. Virtually all of BR is the game itself.

12. BR focuses much more on should they kill each other. In THG, it's pretty much accepted that they have no choice but to kill the others.

13. There's a time limit in BR. None in THG.

14. In THG, the main characters have an alcoholic mentor. In BR, there are no mentors and no alcoholics.

15. There's no escort/hostess in BR (unless you count their former teacher, but that's a completely different, almost opposite, type of character from Effie Trinket).

16. There's no stylist in BR.

17. There's no volunteering for a younger sibling in BR.

18. There's little to nothing dangerous about the arena/island in BR.

19. There's no getting stuck in a tree in BR.

20. There's no tracker jackers or anything remotely similar in BR.

21. There's no riots in BR.

22. There's no mutts in BR.

23. There's "girl on fire" in BR.

24. There's no interviews in BR.

25. You don't see the president (or ruler) in BR.

26. There's no surprise "I'm in love with her" in BR.

27. There's no "rule change" in BR.

28. There's no training auditions in BR.

29. There's no tributes on parade or chariots in BR.

30. There's no sponsors or the challenge of "getting people to like you" in BR.

31. There's no searching for water and no concerns over finding food in BR.

32. In BR, the students have no idea of what is going on. In THG, they are all very aware of the game.

33. In BR, all of the students know each other (except for the two transfers). In THG, none of them know each other with the exception of maybe the one from your District and even that was a maybe.

34. There's no blowing up of the career's supplies in BR. (There is an explosion in BR but for completely different reasons and circumstances.)

35. In HG, the tributes enter the arena by being lifted up and put in a circle with the game starting at the same time for everyone. In BR, they walk into it one at a time.

36. In HG, they have to run to get whatever weapon they get. In BR, they are randomly given a weapon.

37. The weapons in BR are very different and include guns and even machine guns. Virtually all of the weapons (except the bow and arrow) in THG are knives, swords, spears or something similar.

38. The iconic weapon in THG is the bow and arrow. Although there is a cross bow (one of many weapons), there's no bow and arrow in BR.

39. THG has a main character who is highly skilled with a weapon. In BR, the main character has no weaponry skills.

40. The BR location is the same every year. In THG, it changes every year.

41. In BR, the location includes buildings. There's no buildings in THG.

42. There's no playing for the cameras in BR.

43. There's no poisonous berries in BR.


Wow. And that's just off the top of my head in the matter of minutes. Do the movies have a common central theme? Yes, but the differences are also very distinct. Collins could EASILY have written her novel without any hint of BR. I see no evidence to suggest otherwise. Just because you make a space movie, it doesn't mean it copied Star Wars. Wait, Star Wars just copied Star Trek, right?

reply

"Star Wars just copied Star Trek, right?"

also Doc Smith Skylark series, Heinleins "Starship Troopers", and just about any of Andre Nortons science fiction writing.


Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

reply

The only similarity I've seen between BR and HG is that they're both about a game in which teenagers have to kill each other. All BR is is teens killing each other. It doesn't get into anything about why they're being forced to do this or into the dystopian society like HG does.

reply

Exactly. When coming to these boards, it was pretty obvious the BR people were trolls, but given that they were making such a big stink about it, I thought there would at least be several significant coincidences. The movies were just very different. A government forces teens to fight each other until there is a sole survivor in an outdoor area. That's pretty much it. You have trackers, but isn't that pretty obvious given the premise? They are even in different locations (outside the neck versus inside the arm). You have announcements, but again, isn't that obvious? The participants need to know who has died. You have a control room, but once even again, isn't that obvious? I'd also point out that it's not directly in the HG book given that it's from Katniss's perspective. That was largely a movie invention. You can argue a male and female survivor. Gee, as if there aren't hundreds of other movies that could say the same thing. I guess BR plagiarized Raiders of the Lost Ark. You can argue "good guys" versus "bad guys", but isn't that virtually every movie? I'm sure if you look at it close enough, there are other things I'm not listing here, but sheesh, it's a very, very, very weak list. This BR stuff is just trolling. THG could easily have been written without any knowledge of BR and this isn't even remotely close to being a case of plagiarism.

reply