Battle Royalr
I can't believe no-one has noticed the similarity in this film to Battle Royale!
?
I can't believe no-one has noticed the similarity in this film to Battle Royale!
?
Actually, I can't believe people don't realize how similar Battle Royale is to other, previous books, stories, what have you. I do not know how many books I have read or listened to that have similar plots or situations in them going back to the Industrial age.
Doesn't any one read anymore? BR might find it has plagiarized the same or similar ideas from other stories. What is totally shocking to me is that no one is talking about issues that the story brings up and the similarities between either story and today. It totally blows my mind how stupid this world has become and especially the US after the Bush/Cheney administration. It seems as if the entire country was dummied down quite a bit so people wouldn't realize what the hell was going on with the Patriot Act and how it was so apparently stupid to start two wars.
When the movie V for Vendetta came out, Some Americans thought it was about the US when the story was based in England. How is that for arrogance and self contentedness.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Hey, Atheists are not bad people and usually are not this obnoxious when talking about a lot of things. lol
shareYou have something in common with Suzanne Collins. She had not heard of Battle Royale until she submitted The Hunger Games for publication. The editor who read her manuscript said something along the lines of how the book was slightly similar to Battle Royale. Suzanne responded by asking if she should read it. The editor said no, wait until she had completed the story arc so it would not be influenced. I wonder why no one mentions this (it is documented in many interviews) when they discuss the similarities. Instead they yell "plagiarism" or "ripped off" and do not even think it is possible that two authors could possibly have a similar "basic" story-line without having heard of each other.
There have been hundreds (if not thousands) of inventions that were simultaneously invented by more than one person; including the cotton gin, the radio, using electricity, light bulbs, and the telephone, where the inventors had no idea someone else was working on the project. The names in the history books though are the "first" ones to patent their ideas. The point is - it happens every day when someone comes up with something they think is unique but someone else, somewhere else, has already thought of it.
Are you really this ignorant of literary themes or are just pretending. LOTF deals with the theme of betrayal as much as anything else. That is the main theme of BR but you wouldn't know that because you don't understand what the book was about. So what does LOTF have to do with BR, in both stories friend turns on friend to save their lives. It's a huge theme in both books, but you probably missed it because you were too busy listing obscure anime TV series that were never shown on TV in the US. And LOTF has nothing really to do with THG because the main theme of betrayal is not a main theme in that book.
This is the big difference between props in a film and the plot of a book.
Well, for one thing, that list you just made is bull. Some are based on historical events, some are science fiction and other types of fiction. I do not see any that fall under the genre of dystopian fiction, excpet maybe The Running Man because it is in a potential future, and some of them I have never heard before.
Secondly, do you know what dystopian diction is in literature? Gulliver's Travels is considered one of the first, however, in that story, there was no break down of society/governmental unease or tension.
Thirdly, It is hard for me to assess whether you are being sincerely curious or are trying to be a know-it-all, "I am always right" smart ass who is try8ing to be cute. But one thing that still surprises me is the lack of required reading since GWB took office and the fact that I lived in the time before cell phones, kindle, audio books, tablets, laptops, cable tv, even desktop computers, and even cordless phones and DVD players and Netflix. You see, we could not just look things up on the internet because there was no internet and although my family was very wealthy and we did in fact have one of the first microwave ovens that costs over $600.00 and the first VCR which cost about the same and hell, I even had my own color tv and vamped up stereo system and Walkman.So instead of looking up cliff notes on the internet, we actually had to read thee things.
You see, long ago when I was in junior high school, we had an entire year where we read short stories and novels in the dystopian fiction genre for young adult, because they were required reading. These books dealt with a lot of societal, governmental, norms, mores and taboos which ranged from very primitive to highly advanced. These novels were futuristic and there was a bit of science mixed into the story as well. These stories go back to the 1800s until the present.
Lastly, however, and this may or may not be true, may have gotten so far on your high horse that you completely misread, read into or did not understand the point I was trying to make. Here is your little quote:
Your post seems to indicate that there was some work before Battle Royale/Hunger Games which had the same plot, story and premise as Battle Royale/Hunger Games. If so, could you name it?
I can't believe people don't realize how similar Battle Royale is to other, previous books, stories, what have you."
[deleted]
The Hunger Games has been alleged a ripoff of Battle Royale, and therefore plagarism, or alleged plagarism, is whooly on topic just as much as any Team Peeta-loving mother's son.
As far as I can see you, OP, are the only one bringing up Battle Royale. Perhaps you thought this was the board for the latter Hunger Games movies, which rip not BR off bur BR2??
[deleted]
In the battle royale/battle royale 2, the game itself was only a small fraction of the plot. It was used to paint the larger picture. In fact, in both the book and the Battle Royale 2 film, the games didn't start until about 1/2 or 2/3 in. There were a lot of more going on outside of the games. Overall, the hunger battle royale (book) was about a boy navigate himself through a series of event that revolutionized the world she lives in (Japen). The love triangle and the games were merely subplots of the larger picture. There were other equally (or more) important subplots such as political propaganda, the famine, detailed descriptions of the world...etc.
shareI can't believe people don't realize how similar Battle Royale is to other, previous books, stories, what have you.
[deleted]
I don't know if you are a troll but if not well I have to say that almost 100% of people who have seen Hunger Games know that it is pretty much a ripoff at some point. Anyway. Battle Royale was kinda bad and Hunger Games was even worse.
shareYou should read other posts on a site before commenting. The supposed similarity of Hunger Games to Battle Royale has been discussed ad nauseum.
shareI was being sarcastic.
shareNo you weren't. You may have been trying but you came across as being wrong.
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.
[deleted]
[deleted]
Just watched Battle Royale yesterday, a completely loved it. I loved how it had the emotions that Hunger Games has (or tries to have), but pulls it off better. It focuses more on friendship that soppy love :P
share[deleted]
I subscribe to BR and the THG [New Order]
share[deleted]
This series could have gone down as the second best BR2 of all time in the millennium but greed and copycats destroyed those chances. I wish I had a time machine, I would give it to a fan so they they can go back and warn those greedy bosses at lionsgate not to split the book into two miserable parts. the only people that lost are the loyal fans.
share[deleted]
Sorry for the late comment, I don't know if you'll ever happen to read it. However, I just finished to read the whole trilogy of THG and, while I enjoyed it, I still think it's an Americanized version of BR.
I'm not American nor Japanese, but this is still a personal opinion, thus possibly subject to harsh criticism: however, it's my belief that Americans do love strong and clearly expressed emotions. They like thrilling plot twists at the end of a page that force you to immediately read the other pages. They like dramatic love romances. They like quick, hard action with badass heroes and heroins fighting to win, fighting for their dreams. They like strong personalities and life-changing decisions taken in the space of a few seconds. Show and drama. I'm not saying this is necessarily "right" or "wrong", but it's all superficial; and if you have to show a beautiful "surface" to praise your audience you'll certainly begin to neglect what's behind it. That means that Suzanne Collins' books, being YA fictions, are pretty refined on the surface and they certainly are an enjoyable reading but that's all: no hidden meanings, no deep or complex characterizations, no allegories. Just entertainment, that however is essential in any novel.
BR goes far beyond, because the audience is extremely different when it comes to its age and culture. Maybe that's also because Takami is a fairly good writer (not that excellence, but his style is very particular), while Collins, well, it's not.
The difference in depth gets more clear if you look at the world-building of the two novels. They are both settled in an oppressive totalitarian regime; we expect it to be described in his deepest particulars to justify the existence of such cruel games. That should be an important part of the story. However, while Takami builds a realistic, plausible regime (modeled after North Korea's governement, I believe), Collins fails. How such a dystopic reality was born, for example, is never explained; only some general natural disasters are vaguely mentioned, but this doesn't resolve the issue.
But the most important flaw that comes to my mind is that history teaches that this kind of governement CAN'T rely only on oppression, punishment and repression. There must be a politic ideology, a social binding agent to justify the government's actions; otherwise, a regime that represses personal freedoms, starves its citizens as a form of punishment and sends their children to die in a cruel game even broadcasting their deaths on TV, well that regime would just fall down in a couple of years. Maybe that's not really important for Collins, whose most important purpose was to entertain the audience (her target probably couldn't even understand all these questions and however they likely don't care), but, again, that's a pretty superficial way of writing. Parts of Takami's world can be traced in some actually existent regimes and it can make you believe that what is written could REALLY happen somewhere, even where you live, thus leading also to all those kind of question you've expressed (what would I do? How would I behave?)
Furthermore, BR was even more shocking given its disregard of the "community culture" which is so deeply rooted in the Japanese society. THG explores the theme of violence among kids (which is, instead, quite heart-felt in the US), but in a more vague and less complex way.
I would like to say much more but I'm not really able to express myself in a correct English and I don't even know if someone can understand what I've just written :P
Ryu shouldn't have been screaming "Shuya!" as that was a good way for another Tribute who wasn't Shuya to find out where she was and kill her. And, that's exactly what happened. Matao shot Ryu with a spear. Shuya should have made sure no one else was around when he took Ryu out of the trap. So, her death is both of their faults.
share