MovieChat Forums > Total Recall (2012) Discussion > There are literally 931 lens flares in t...

There are literally 931 lens flares in this movie!

posted 10 years ago by Darwinskid
9 replies | jump to latest

Video proof/count --
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqWYm-EDS8U

And if you think its less than what JJ Abrams uses, think again-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYgG9MhV5Q0&src_vid=nqWYm-EDS8U&amp ;amp ;feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_454009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIF14mwaSKI&src_vid=wYgG9MhV5Q0&amp ;amp ;feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_1177626999

Numbers don't lie.

[–] Abasi 10 years ago

That is the entire reason I came onto imdb today. Thank you.

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] nickbotic12 9 years ago

Whole reason I hopped on here was to see if anyone else had mentioned the lens flares lol it's ridiculous

[–] MajesoFormo 9 years ago

I cant believe anyone would hire such a talentless worthless director whose only goal is to destroy a film with lens flares like he does in all his movies, hollywood should wise up and blacklist him. Noone likes his movies because hes so bad at making them.

START THE REVOLUTION! SHRED THE GOVERNMENT! My favorite movie is V for Vendetta.
BridgetTheFish

[–] alouette1977 8 years ago

Len Wiseman has no style of his own. He just borrows from other, superior directors. He's like the new Peter Hyams, who just borrowed from Willaim Friedkin and Ridley Scott.

Everyone else may be an a**hole, but I'm not! - Harlan Ellison

[–] MuggySphere 8 years ago

And what about JJ Abrams?

He loves lens flare in his movies

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Lowenbotten 8 years ago

What's the difference between having 931 lens flares and "literally" having 931 lens flares?

[–] ImGergely 8 years ago

Probably all 931 were in the script. ;) Alas, not much of anything else.