Oh so now the 'radical' anti war protesters are the terrorists?
One gorgeous piece of "domestic terrorists" propaganda waiting.
shareDidn't you see the cast list? This film defends the terrorists.
The point of this film is to justify people like Bill Ayers etc. The moral of the movie is: If you're a socialist, it's OK to be a terrorist.
Both of you are so far off base it's ridiculous. I won't even bother explaining unless I see a sign that you are actually willing to listen. This isn't me being preachy, I'm willing to listen to any REAL rationale on why you know the moral of the movie and why it's such a boiled down, inflammatory statement.
Besides that, it seems like what people like you want is to just start the least civil possible arguments because it's likely already decided in your mind that there is no reasoning with anyone who identitifies with the left or as a democratic-socialist. Granted, there are plenty of people on the the sides of these various "political fences" that think that about their....unfortunate opposition. Considering we are supposed to be working together...but I digress, I reckon.
You have no idea what this film is about and I'm willing to do this little thing that used to happen a bit more before the Reagan-era political arena that was built, though it's something we've had a deficit of since this country's inception on ALMOST everything. Including our scrutinizing of our founding documents. And that is elaboration, it's very clear that few people are willing to take the time to justify their beliefs and idealogies. The funny thing is, you could literally make a 1-2 page-worthy elaboration, copy it to a wordpad or notepad or microsoft word or whatever you use (I use y-writer), then you just paste it every time. You modify it as your argument evolves or is changed, and you NEVER make the elaboration without being willing and able to look at someone else's and perhaps even admit you're wrong.
I know from personal experience how hard it is to change one's political and religious idealogies, and by change I don't mean shifting in the same direction to a further extreme. I mean a pure ideological epiphany which lead to an evolution that continues. Evolution isn't always advancement but it is an advanced form of change in certain contexts.
Honestly, that is somewhat reasonable. The notion that there is no reasoning with the left.
Both the Left and Right have very unpleasant ideas that are implicit in their ideologies. But the Right is often very eager to say out these unpleasant ideas, which makes them seem unpleasant.
The Left is very reluctant, on the other hand, to admit to them. Which to me, makes them dishonest. Basically, the Right may be *beep* but at least they admit they are *beep* The Left are *beep* and unwilling to admit it.