Didn't work for me


Firstly, keeping the names of places and characters from the original was not the best choice in my opinion. It felt misplaced; fantastic; unrealistic. If the film was set in Bosnia and Yugoslavia, and characters with Slavic names, I think the essence of the story would've been better presented. I mean, the characters and the story are indeed very contemporary and realistic, but the way they were shown in the movie just seemed too far from a real scenario and a little too hard to take seriously (and this is a film that takes itself very seriously). Nowadays Rome is the capital of Italy, and that's it.

Secondly, Shakespearian dialogue didn't work very well either in my opinion. I don't think adapting Shakespeare to modern English necessarily means you will take away the wit and humour from his original work; a good adaptation might very well maintain the original content and only make a few updates on the form. It shouldn't be done to make the dialogue "easier" to non-initiated audiences, but especially to adequate the dialogue to the scenario presented in the film. I mean, Shakespeare's pompous and far-fetched dialogue is completely misplaced when delivered by a newsreader in television (as it happens during the film). That would've worked wonderfully in a comedy, but that's not the case here.

Anyway, I think the concept of the film is quite interesting but I would have executed it differently.

My rating for this is 05/10.

reply

I think many people share your opinion, myself included. The blend of modern setting and Shakespearean dialogue made the whole affair seem snobby. It seems the makers of the film were more concerned about keeping it "Shakespearean" while adding a "unique" twist, as opposed to telling a story with characters you can actually empathize with. Couldn't bring myself to care about their over the top issues.

If Monty Python did this, it would probably be hilarious, but this film is guilty of being ridiculous without having any self-awareness of how ridiculous it is.

reply

If Monty Python did this, it would probably be hilarious, but this film is guilty of being ridiculous without having any self-awareness of how ridiculous it is.


Haha, yeah, if Monty Python did this it would've been a classic!

In Brancaleone alle crociate the characters start speaking in rhymes in the middle of the film for no reason, and it is genius.

reply

I think your taste and reasons therefrom are highly questionable.

The whole reason you go to a "Shakespeare" play is to experience language. The language was the special effects of the time. People like artistic language, and the author of the portfolio was a master at it.

reply

"language was the special effects of the time", oh sure and this movie was a faithful adaptation of the original play in every detail right?! Anyway, that was one of the main points in my original post, duh.

reply

Take away the Roman context, and take away Shakespearean language? What does that leave? A completely different film. Good luck writing a modern English adaptation of Shakespeare. Your idea is so original I am sure no one has ever thought of it!

reply

Well said zig_utzig, completely agree!

reply