MovieChat Forums > Emma (2010) Discussion > The Positives of this Emma and Scenes th...

The Positives of this Emma and Scenes that should have been included


I think Sandy Welch did a wonderful job of adapting the book, and Romola Garai did a great job of bringing out both the good and bad of Emma. I think a lot of the threads tend to focus on the negatives of this 2009 series. Because, yes, while Emma does have all the social graces of a lady in her station, she is a snob. She's kind-hearted, selfless when it comes to her own needs in comparison to familial duty, has extreme class anxiety, and is so conscious about social perception. She's arrogant but vulnerable, full of herself but wants to help others, and inconsistent in her behavior. In this way, she is remarkably and lovably human.

Does anyone recall in the book where Emma is discussing the Coles ("low-born" tradespeople who have become the second richest family in town)? At one point, she says that she wants to refuse their party invitation but is afraid that if she refuses, they'll think it's because her father is a recluse... That is, she wants to convey "how dare you extend an invitation to me" with her refusal. While she's not outwardly rude, she's exceeding conscious of class, as it was at that time. And, when the invitation is delayed, she feels a bit hurt and rejected, despite having gone on and on about wanting to refuse. She even goes out of her way to read the invitation, when it does arrive, to her house guests so that they might persuade her to come. She loves causing a reaction. Prior to that, she talks about Churchill and his journey to London for a simple haircut; she finds that vain and frivolous (something Mr Knightley actually says out-loud), but tries to excuse his behavior.

With this short illustration, my point is that we cannot compare this mini series to the movies. There's so much happening in the book, so many facets of her personality that don't always come across that people tend to lose sight of who Emma actually is. Though a woman of her time, she's also a very timeless character, her characteristics "modern" in that we still act very much the same.

My question is: are there scenes like this that you wish were included in the series (were it not pressed for time)? What did you like about this series?

reply

are there scenes like this that you wish were included in the series (were it not pressed for time)?


It's been a while since I read the book, but I remember I laughed so much when Emma and Harriet went to Mr. Elton's place. That scene would have worked perfectly on this adaptation.


What did you like about this series?


It would take me days to mention everything I love about the series, so I'll stick to one. And because she doesn't get enough love I'll have to say Christina Cole.

Mrs. Elton: Biscuits, darling.

Mr. Elton: Absolutely!

reply

I heartily agree about Christina Cole - she is by leaps and bounds the best Mrs. Elton among the three I have seen (the two 1996 films being the other two). While I prfer, overall, the Kate Beckinsale version as the most Austenian in spirit, only Christina Cole is allowed to play Mrs. Elton relatively straight, and what a wonderful choice! She is perfectly horrid as she is, we don't need it pointed out to us by an over-broad interpretation.

Don't get me wrong about this version of "Emma," while it isn't the most faithful it does examine and explore some of the novel's less noticed themes - loneliness, loss, more deeply than any other I have seen, and Romola Garia, beneath her excesses (the production's choices), is a real Emma Woodhouse. She is a marvelous actress indeed.

Oh, right. So, she secretly trained a flock of sandflies.

reply

I'm just reading through Emma and noticed something Emma says when talking to Harriet about what "real" gentleman were compared to Robert Martin. Here is the quote:

"Mr. Knightley's air is so remarkably good that it is not fair to compare Mr. Martin with him. You might not see one in a hundred with gentleman so plainly written as in Mr. Knightley. But he is not the only gentleman you have been lately used to. What say you to Mr. Weston and Mr. Elton? Compare Mr. Martin with either of them. Compare their manner of carrying themselves; of walking; of speaking; of being silent. You must see the difference."


It just struck me as incredibly funny for Emma to include "of being silent." As if they were more the gentleman for how they were silent. As if in the 10 seconds she got to watch Robert, she'd know "how" he would be silent. I think it was Austen's way of showing how pretentious Emma was becoming with Harriet...you know, like SHE is this masterful expert on gentleman in general and how she'd flower up her conversation in trying to steer Harriet away from Robert. I think that added line would be a nice addition and wouldn't take that much time to include.

reply