MovieChat Forums > Nude Nuns with Big Guns (2010) Discussion > They really expect people to pay to see ...

They really expect people to pay to see crap like this?


freaking wankers make crap like this then try to sue 5000+ bittorrent users for simply accessing something online. Those responsible for this lawsuit are obviously desperate to at least break even on their measly $85,000 budget. Haha, good luck jerks, Do they really think the people that downloaded this trash would have paid to see it if they couldnt download it? Most of the people who downloaded this probably just assumed from the low budget & tacky title that the producers didnt take this thing too seriously and maybe were even leaching the files themselves. There are at least 2 separate parties which claim ownership of this film! They themselves can't even decide who actually owns this film yet they attempt to sue some people who simply downloaded the freely available file online?

reply

I half-expected a pr0n0, seeing the title. But to answer your question: No, not even if it were a pr0n0.
Ok, maybe if the naked nuns happened to be Ginger Lynn, Raylenne, Michelle Wild and Jenna J. And the big guns Bobby Vitale, Randy Spears and John Holmes.
Were they really trying to sue people over this? My, what gall.

reply

Funny thing about "budgets" is that they are usually "estimated", which means it is what the film would have cost if they had actually used certain actors or equipment, etc.

I could have said the "budget" on my film was 50,000.00 (estimated) but in reality, which I believe in posting as to some "would have cost this much if...." figure, it was a whopping 8000.00

The idea, or so I've heard, is to make it look expensive so if a distributor comes along and wants to buy the film, they can see what it cost, or would have, or whatever. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me since you would have to show an expense report, etc. etc. to prove the cost.

Anyway, just thought I'd share that.

"Supercharge this."

reply

This movie was made to fill up cable schedules... Under those terms, even if you are paying for it, at least you aren't doing so in isolation... If you see no need for cable and you choose to download it, fine - but don't complain if you happen to get busted for something you knew was illegal, in the first place (regardless of moral arguments over whether it SHOULD be illegal, or not).






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply