during museum scene


last kid from the museum was a roderick's grand grand... son?

reply

I was thinking that too! The bag, and that look. He was some kind of descendant of Roderick's family tree.

reply

also the teeth

reply

ThorRulez ยป
I was thinking that too! The bag, and that look. He was some kind of descendant of Roderick's family tree.


why does a descendent have to be male?



bill_is_always
Yeah, the tour guide says "come on Roddey," and the boy looks kind of like Roderick. Then he smirks at the crown. It's all implied that the kid is descendent of Roderick and is planning on finishing what his (however many greats) great grandpa started.



what does the descendent have to finish?



if Roderick is dead how does he have any kids?




actionmanrandell
he was a lord you don't think he had concubines and bastard children



how would a bastard child be recoganized by the Royal Family?













reply

why would his descendant of hundreds of years have the same style bag as him
just why
what is it supposed to mean
evil is genetic? man-purses are genetic?
**** this movie

reply

Yeah, the tour guide says "come on Roddey," and the boy looks kind of like Roderick. Then he smirks at the crown. It's all implied that the kid is descendent of Roderick and is planning on finishing what his (however many greats) great grandpa started.

reply

would be kind of weird since Roderick wasn't married yet to the princess... and then he died... maybe some of spring through family.... but that would be a bit farfetched... then again the whole film/tale is farfetched ;) maybe it's some kind of Cloud Atlas-like reference ... and by that i mean.... somewehere in the far future there's always some duplicate of you walking around.... be it, or be it not offspring by blood...


OR....


Roderick isn't dead yet, because somehow he survived being stabbed, being buried in rocks, being trambled and somehow got down on one of the beanstalks in time before they got cut down...


why am i even replying this ????? :D

reply

OR....


Roderick isn't dead yet, because somehow he survived being stabbed, being buried in rocks, being trambled and somehow got down on one of the beanstalks in time before they got cut down...


Haha that made me LOL

loved the movie btw, glad Singer got a hit with his next one, but this was a good old fashioned well made adventure film with great native 3D (respect for that)

reply

he was a lord you don't think he had concubines and bastard children

reply

more than grand grand son

there was hundreds of years

between them

there is 25 between every generation so it was likely his great great great great great great great great great etc etc grand son

reply

Yeah, I mean judging by the name (Roddy) and the fact that he had an almost uncanny resemblance to Stanley Tucci, I'd say that was heavily implied.

___
http://tinyurl.com/nxthxvx

reply

It probably is a descendent but don't expect a sequel. It cost almost $200 million to make and only barely made it's money back worldwide. If it had broke even just in the U.S.A., there probably would have been a sequel.

reply

It probably is a descendent but don't expect a sequel. It cost almost $200 million to make and only barely made it's money back worldwide. If it had broke even just in the U.S.A., there probably would have been a sequel.

The question is how much it actually earned home. Not every country has released their info about how much it earned in their countries.
The list of released countries on Box Office Mojo, is shorter than the list of countries here on IMDb.

reply

[deleted]

Any milkmaid, domestic servant wench or professional whore unlucky enough to be in a 20 mile radius of the utter bastard that was Tucchi's character-by the time of his well deserved death, he was old enough to have sired dozens of offspring bastards.

"What is an Oprah?"-Teal'c.

reply