.....than the actors portraying these great artists.
I appreciate this programme is bringing the story of The Brotherhood to people's attention who previously might not have known or bothered to look the Pre-Raphaelites up. But did the BBC really have to make this utter sh!theap?
They could have gotten finer actors, made it less softcore porn-more drama and not gotten a retarded monkey to write the script.
It's probably the worst, most offensive thing I've ever seen - and I've seen Two Girls One Cup.
Well after three episodes, I have to admit I'm hooked.
It's not pretentious, cheesey, pseudo-historical tat like the Tudors, in fact, it doesn't take itself seriously at all. I don't think the Pre-Raphaelite movement is doing all that well but hell, if it encourages a few more people into The Walker Art Gallery, that's gotta be a score.
The Pre-Raphaelite movement has been out of fashion for years but as an avid lover of their work and having read all of their biographies and seen the brilliantly-executed documentary series aired recently, why oh why did they have to make this drama so camp and awful?
However, I do agree with you that if it encourages more people into The Walker Art Gallery and indeed Tate Britain, then that can only be a good thing.
I just wish this programme hadn't been made so badly with terrible actors and poor script.
Actually, there's been a great surge in popularity for Pre-Raphaelite art (and Victorian Romantic art, and Edwardian illustration), over the last 10 years.
I really don't think it's that bad?! It's light hearted entertainment to be honest, it requires a sense of humour and fun, and they're actually not deviating that far away from the real events, sure it's not accurate, but at least the basic relationships are right.