MovieChat Forums > The Dark Knight Rises (2012) Discussion > What If David Tennant Had Been Cast As T...

What If David Tennant Had Been Cast As The Riddler In The Dark Knight Rises


https://screenrant.com/david-tennant-riddler-cast-dark-knight-rises-what-if/

If David Tennant had been cast as the Riddler in The Dark Knight Rises, as was widely rumored in the film's early stages, the movie would have been entirely different. Instead of focusing on a large-scale battle, the film might have continued Heath Ledger's legacy as the Joker, showcasing a psychopathic villain and telling a subtler, character-driven story. Tennant would have brought depth and realism to the comic book supervillain, giving his conflict with Batman a more personal and Machiavellian touch instead of engaging in a grandiose battle.

Following Tennant's tenure on Doctor Who, the Scottish actor was free to pursue all kinds of projects, including some major Hollywood blockbusters. As the popularity of Doctor Who rose in America, Tennant was no longer limited to movies and TV shows in the United Kingdom. When news broke that the Riddler, a.k.a. Edward Nygma, might be featured in Christopher Nolan's sequel to The Dark Knight, fans quickly congregated online to put forth Tennant as a candidate. Tennant became a fan favorite for the role, although more well-known American actors were also considered.

The idea to include the Riddler in The Dark Knight Rises eventually faded due to Nolan deciding to move away from the Joker's mind games in favor of an imposing physical threat, Bane. But Tennant's Riddler would have undoubtedly made for an excellent adaptation, especially paired with Nolan's ability to connect comic book storylines to the real world. If Tennant had been cast as the Riddler, he would have presented a uniquely different challenge to Bruce Wayne, continuing the story of the billionaire's personal growth and perhaps giving his story a more meaningful ending.

After David Tennant left Doctor Who, ending his nearly five-year reign as one of the most popular Time Lords in Russell T. Davies' reboot, rumors abounded as to his next project. The classically-trained Tennant displayed a wide range of acting ability during his time as the Tenth Doctor, able to make viewers laugh one minute and cry the next, moving from lighthearted humor to tragic monologues in the blink of an eye. The dexterity and depth Tennant showed on Doctor Who seemed to leave every door open to him, including one into Christopher Nolan's next Hollywood blockbuster, The Dark Knight Rises.

As production began on the Batman sequel, fans of The Dark Knight and Doctor Who took to the internet to lobby producers to cast Tennant as the franchise's rumored next villain, The Riddler. Tennant's role as the occasionally arrogant, always intelligent, and energetic Doctor made it easy to imagine him stepping into the shoes of the Riddler, an egotistical lawbreaker who leaves behind clues in the form of riddles and word games. Tennant's fast-talking Doctor, who could display a darker edge at the drop of a hat, made him a fan favorite for the psychopathic Gothamite.

Following Nolan's critical and commercial success with The Dark Knight — and in particular, his adaptation of the Joker, played by Heath Ledger — producers encouraged him to put another well-known comic book character on the big screen. Warner Bros.' initial proposal for a Dark Knight sequel used the Riddler as the primary antagonist, perhaps in an effort to perpetuate Nolan's gritty and dark filmmaking style. Riddler had not been seen on film since the 1995 movie Batman Forever, directed by Joel Schumacher. In that movie, Edward Nygma was portrayed by Jim Carrey, highlighting the character's comedic rather than narcissistic tendencies.

Following the studio's suggestion, reports that the Riddler would be included in The Dark Knight Rises abounded, with Leonardo DiCaprio, Johnny Depp, and David Tennant all suggested as possible casting choices. Before the final script was written, however, Nolan decided to go a different route, using Bane as the main villain. The choice was allegedly made because Nolan felt that the Riddler would not fit as well into his realistic portrayal of Batman and Gotham City.

Tennant's Riddler in The Dark Knight Rises would likely have been a complex criminal mastermind, amoral and uncaring of anything except for the next game. Fans of Tennant got a peek at his ability to play a supervillain when he was cast as Kilgrave in Jessica Jones. Tennant's spine-tingling performance showed Kilgrave using his powers without hesitation, unable to understand why he shouldn't simply have everything he wants. In the show, Kilgrave had no respect for human life or consent, tracking Jessica with a fanatic devotion that often resulted in the death or torture of innocents.

reply

He'd been great.

reply

Nolan never would have used the Riddler, it doesn't fit into his universe very well. The truth is the Riddler was never considered despite the rumors that Leonardo Di Caprio would be the Riddler.

reply

I think it would have felt a bit anti-climactic. Riddler's a too-clever-for-his-own-good bank robber, and the first two films were about Batman crippling the mob in Gotham. It needed an epic farewell.

Of course, I'd argue that it needed a *better* (or even good) epic farewell, but still...

Me? I'd have gone with Black Mask. Part 1: gangsters, Part 2: masked villains, so Part 3 could have been a synthesis: masked mobsters.

I did like what Nolan did with Bane in terms of motivation and goals. That brought things full-circle. Again, I wasn't a fan of the execution here, but that idea was neat. I do think working the Bane story from the comics should have been done over two movies.

The other option might have been Man-bat: pushing into a quasi-supernatural realm and pushing the "evil mirror image of Batman" thing further still.

reply

really was that epic? talias horrible death scene? bane getting hit by a car? I agree it tried to be epic but failed imo

reply

I think the scope of the film aimed at epic. I do think that having the League return, take over Gotham, create an anarchic state, and are threatening everything Batman cares for with a nuclear device - yeah, that's epic.

I also think it was poorly executed in a lot of places. Some scenes are really great, others aren't. There are some wonderful moments and really good characterization, but also some bafflingly bad writing (lookin' at you "I saw you were Batman by your eyes) and bit plot holes.

The idea of the cops v. League-and-thugs/inmates idea was great and could have been epic, but the throwdown between Bane, Batman, and Talia was, at the last, anticlimactic.

So, I do hear what you're saying, and I agree: it tried to be epic and failed to deliver.

Now, my point with the last post was that the ideas were set for a big, grand finale and using the Riddler would have resulted in some cryptic crossword clues and a bank robbery. That's planning for failure (as Archer says, "Even worse than regular planning")

reply

to think we almsot got that... and instead got this pile of turd.... I love David tennant I won't say hes underrated because hes certainly well appreciated by many. but I really do love him

reply

David Tennant wouldve been over the moon and most likely gone on to a nice hollywood movie career (see Karen Gillain)

reply