MovieChat Forums > The Dark Knight Rises (2012) Discussion > Why wasn't Alfred surprised to see Bruce...

Why wasn't Alfred surprised to see Bruce at the end?


.

reply

He was but at the same time there wasn't anything left to say, he knew that Bruce had made it and that he was happy. Didn't you pay attention when Alfred alluded to this at the very beginning?

reply

Just imagine you think your adopted son is dead, and then you see him alive. Regardless of the circumstances, just casually nodding is the most bizarre and inhuman response imaginable. There also was a lot to say.

reply

Not at all, he knew Bruce had made it and that he was happy, a nod was all that was needed, again they set this up 17 minutes into the movie you weren’t paying attention

reply

I was paying attention, that's why I said "regardless of the circumstances". I have no problem suspending my disbelief in movies, but not when it's completely ridiculous.

Alfred is a human, so he should've reacted like one. If anyone saw their adopted son they believed to be dead, they'd be so shocked, they wouldn't be able to think about that. Their human instincts would take over, and their automatic response would be to run over and hug them.

reply

I don't think you were paying attention, Alfred flat out said that he wouldn't need to say anything to him but he would know that he made it and was going to be alright. I'm pretty sure Nolan would understand his own character better than you would.

reply

[deleted]

You completely missed my point. My point is none of that matters. All that matters is that Alfred didn't react the way any human would automatically react, even in those circumstances.

Also, here's another reason that scene is completely ridiculous: I understand why Alfred wanted Bruce to leave Gotham, so he could be happy. But why does that mean they had to end their relationship? Why couldn't they continue their father-son relationship, and never talk about Gotham? They made each other happier.

reply

What defines how a “normal human” would react? His actions were consistent with his character, I have no idea what you’re complaining about . Also he said quite clearly he never wanted Bruce to come back to Gotham, if they started having an in-depth conversation reflecting on past times Bruce might change his mind about leaving Gotham. Seriously man pay attention.

reply

I know for a fact that if anyone had an adopted son who they loved, and was believed to be dead, and was later found alive, nobody would react the way Alfred did, no matter the circumstances. It would be downright impossible. There are some automatic responses that are unavoidable.

They didn't need to reflect on past times, they could've just had a normal father-son relationship. They could've Skyped every day, and Alfred could afford to visit frequently. There are lots of things they could've spoken about that aren't related to Gotham or the past. I don't even think they'd need to limit their conversation topics though, Bruce is too strong to change his mind about leaving Gotham.

reply

You still haven't explained what defines a "normal" human interaction. Alfred's character clearly establishes that is how he would react to this situation. Also having them hug and make up and everything would have been too cliched and stupid, the way the scene was shot was absolutely perfect.

reply

I never mentioned anything about "normal human interaction". I assume you mean "reaction". Well I'm using common sense. I understand you're more willing to suspend your disbelief than me, but I think you know nobody would react that way in real life. They couldn't even if they wanted to, it would be physically impossible. Basic human instincts would take over.

Alfred did say that would be how he'd react, but obviously he didn't mean if he believed Bruce was dead.

reply

How do you define what is common sense and what isn't in this situation? Alfred specifically said it was his fantasy that "you wouldn't say anything to me nor me to you, but we'd both know that you made it and that you were happy". You're talking nonsense here. Please show me where he said he wouldn't want that to happen if he thought Bruce was dead? Also in those 7 years for all he knew Bruce could have been dead, he hadn't heard from him in forever. I think you're looking for something to complain about.

reply

I think Alfred knew he couldn't react the way he wanted to because Bruce's escape could be ruined by something like a huge reaction. Unlikely, but possible. The nod was just to confirm, "It *is* you, right?" and that was all they could do. They certainly couldn't stay in touch.

I will give you this, though: it would have been nice to see a bit more struggle on Alfred's face trying to suppress all of that.

And the film does give a weird, upbeat tone to "One of the closest people in Alfred's life (or Bruce's, come to that) will never see or speak to him again, and that's positive!" They could have hit the bittersweetness of that more. But, like the rest of the movie, it's a bit of a muddle.

reply

That's a good argument, but I'll repeat what I said above:

"I know for a fact that if anyone had an adopted son who they loved, and was believed to be dead, and was later found alive, nobody would react the way Alfred did, no matter the circumstances. It would be downright impossible. There are some automatic responses that are unavoidable."

I also don't understand why they couldn't stay in touch. They could've Skyped every day, and Alfred could afford to visit frequently. I don't see how anyone could find out. And now that I think about it, why did Bruce even need to fake his death? Why couldn't he just leave?

reply

That's why it would've been nice to see more of a struggle from Alfred trying to surpress it all. He does appear to be affected by seeing Bruce, but not at the level that is warranted for such a moment. Basically, yeah, I agree with you. Although I don't think he should have necessarily broken down completely in the restaurant or yelled, "Hey, BRUCE! YOU'RE ALIVE! ...whoops..." It would've been nice to see a tear or two, to see his body posture dramatically change...yes, absolutely.

The meta-answer is that they wanted a particular ending where Bruce could go off into the sunset and leave Batmanning behind him. They wanted a closed-end to the trilogy but they weren't willing to actually kill off Batman, so they picked a destination and crammed the movie into it.

In-universe, I don't remember how many people knew he was Batman. Did Gordon know? Did the city at large? I can't recall, and it's possible that he wasn't taking risks that the League of Shadows would still know about him and pursue him.

On the other hand, that raises plenty more questions. Most prominently: if the League still exists, Bruce should, at this point, stalk them down to end them before they return. He shouldn't leave his bat-stuff in the hands of not-Robin without any training period.

Really, what he should do is stay on-board as Bats for at least a month, using Blake to make it look like Batman can teleport (not to mention survive a nuclear bomb blast). If the whole idea is that he must be a symbol and terrify criminals on a mythological level, why not use his new recruit to really freak 'em out?

The answer: the movie's got a wonky script.

reply

I also don't understand why they couldn't stay in touch. They could've Skyped every day, and Alfred could afford to visit frequently.


It's for the same reason why Michael Caine couldn't just bring Leonardo's children to see him in Inception.

reply

Because he was imagining it. Bruce died.

reply

There is nothing in the film to suggest that and Nolan himself even confirmed Bruce was alive, plus having him die would contradict everything the franchise had been building up to since Batman Begins. I really think Nolan knows more about this than you do.

reply

RIP Bruce 😢

reply

He survived, get over it.

reply

It's a reasonable interpretation, I just don't agree with it.

reply

It's not a reasonable interpretation, there is nothing in the movie to suggest he died.

reply

I meant your view is a reasonable interpretation, even though I don't agree with it.

reply

OH gotcha

reply

I've heard that theory before, and while I don't think that's what Nolan was going for or what the movie presents, it seems reasonable to me.

For a few minutes, in fact, the movie had me convinced that Bruce did die in the explosion and I thought it was a pretty gutsy and satisfying way to end the series.

reply

He looked rather surprised to me. You could tell he was about to shed a tear. He just kept it contained like the stolid English gentleman that he is.

reply

But to address the OP's actual question:

I believe Alfred actually went there HOPING he would find Bruce. That's why he's not surprised.

He may well have heard about the new Bat Signal, but it's a near certainty that Lucius would tell him about the autopilot patch.

He also knows the importance of that pearl necklace, so its absence would definitely get Alfred thinking.

So, hoping against hope, he hops a flight to Florence, heads to that cafe on the banks of the Arno, and sits there with his Fernet Branca. Just like he told Bruce. Because he never gives up on Bruce. And Bruce came through for him, one last time.

reply

Because Fox told him about the autopilot fix, so Alfred was well aware Bruce could still be alive.

I'm glad he did though. Incredible dedication by the incognito Bruce to be going from riverside cafe to riverside cafe in Florence every single evening in the hope that Alfred would turn up at the same one he was in at some point...

I guess he must have realised Fox would work it out from the autopilot patch and tell Alfred. Then it was just a case of cafe hopping ad infinitum until he showed up. Foolproof plan.

reply

Sometimes I think certain users here just love to troll, which is why I pick my battles wisely.

reply