MovieChat Forums > Anne Boleyn (2021) Discussion > Surprise, surprise. The factually incorr...

Surprise, surprise. The factually incorrect Anne Boleyn flopped


Actually I'm not surprised at all.

reply

They don't care. Wokes that inject their politics in media don't own shares. Drinks are on the house, once they've destroyed a company, they'll jump to the next one and will start again.

reply

Have BBC announced a sequel to deflect? That's what Hollyweird does when their woke trash flops.

reply

sorry what does Hollywood have to do with the BBC.

reply

Where does it say this?

RT manipulates the figures to suit woke bastards.
MC manipulates the figures to suit woke bastards.

Even IMDb is jumping on the woke bastard bandwagon by saying the rating for this shitshow is 6.9, due to this remark:

"Our rating mechanism has detected unusual voting activity on this title. To preserve the reliability of our rating system, an alternate weighting calculation has been applied."

Yet look at the actual voting history, and it's almost entirely 1 out of 10s!!!

reply

yeah it is bullshit how corrupt and shit all those rating sites are. there are comedies that are soo funny and great with horrible rating but genuinely boring as shit movies that totally fucking suck get risen up. u cant trust any of those rating at all. it actually better to judge a movie badly if it has a good rating on all the mainstream rating sites and consider the movie interesting if the rating is bad

reply

Don't trust anything except what you tell us to, LOL

reply

These forums breaking away from IMDb are the best thing that’s happened to it.

reply

Yes almost entirely 1 out of 10s from people who haven’t watched a single second of it. If that’s not "unusual voting activity" I don’t know what is. Well actually unfortunately it really is not that unusual for butthurt losers to rate things that trigger them 1/10 without ever watching them.

reply

They're protesting against history being rewritten to suit minorities and diversity, and I'll happily join them. I just can't be bothered to rate things on IMDb anymore.

reply

The only butthurt loser here is you.
You dismiss their reason for 1 star ratings as if you have no idea why they do this.
These aren't troll ratings, these are honest opinions and you are not to decide if these are legitimate or not.

A fucking black Anne Boleyn, are you kidding me!?

reply

Seriously! You do not even have to watch one second of it knowing that Anne Boelyn is played by a black person. Can you imagine a series about King Shaka of the Zulu Nation with Gerard Butler cast as Shaka? Do you think the Woke crowd would decide to reserve judgement until they had seen it, with the knowledge that a white man was playing an African King? No. They would give it a 1 unseen, which is what it would deserve for the idiocy of playing with history in that manner. Just as this crap deserves a 1.

reply

If I'd be some rich ass Hollywood mogul, I'd immediately start producing a Martin Luther King series........ with some black white straight male. I'd white wash it to Oblivion only to troll the Woko Haram hordes.

reply

That would be beautiful! And watch it become a runaway success!

reply

Stop voting 1. do it a 2 or 3 ;)

reply

I am dismayed by this failure. We need more diversity, whether it is historically accurate or not. Without diversity, the whole world will decay into nothingness.

reply

Without diversity, the whole world will decay into nothingness.

This is why we need to stop and reverse multi-culturalism because it destroys diversity by blending everything together.


reply

On it's face this is ridiculous. Might as well tell the rocks to not reflect the changes the their times.

reply

Small levels of immigration and mixing are usual, healthy and historical. But the mass immigration we have been seeing since the end of WW2 is a disaster for true diversity which relies on a good degree of isolation and long periods of time and continuity to develop.


reply