Wow. lets you know how dangerous an unarmed populace is...
he was free to reign terror... this wouldn't happen in texas or arizona.
sharehe was free to reign terror... this wouldn't happen in texas or arizona.
shareBullsh*t. Doesn't matter if people are armed or not. This guy obviously took the time to plan out his attack. If someone goes through that amount of planning, I highly doubt some idiot waving a gun around thinking he's going to stop him will be successful. Sure, the person may have a bigger obstacle in Texas or Arizona, but if the person is from that area, they will most likely plan ahead for what they may face.
Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!Spoilers!
having a gun gives you a fighting chance of survival. not having one. well you better be a good runner or master at hide n seek. emphasis on the hiding part. Oklahoma has very good gun laws. Hence why timothy mcveigh had to use explosives. he wouldn't be able to mow people down with a couple machine guns over there.
I'd rather die opposing some mad man than how those women died cowering in a corner in the salon. But what could they do? unarmed peasants. fish in a barrel. Not having a gun vs someone with a gun. How do you win? and no a rocket launcher doesn't count. Enlighten me. (and if you say some bs like ban all guns i will strangle you, there are over 200 million guns in the u.s. you're not putting the genie back in the bottle or the toothpaste back in the tube they are here to stay) also if i wanted an illegal weapon i can get one with ease in downtown l.a. just need the greenbacks. so that's a big fail. same reason why heroin is illegal. ppl still find it readily available.
Did you say Arizona? My state? My hometown where a gunman walked into a Safeway and shot up innocent people?
You might want stick with Texas on the examples
*Dont tell God how big your problems are. Tell your problems how big your God is!*
And Max makes good point. I'd rather die with a gun in my hand shooting back than cowering in a corner with no other options
*Dont tell God how big your problems are. Tell your problems how big your God is!*
[deleted]
I'll take my chances on a random, lone psychopath shooting everyone in a town over having to worry about going to eat or to the movies with a huge room full of trigger happy, gun toting people eager to "protect" themselves.
Honestly, I understand the temptation to view gun possession as the only way to defend oneself, but it's never really thought out well. There are stories everywhere about someone shooting a gun in the air at a party in celebration, only to cause a panic, leading others to pull their guns out and inevitably cause tragedies. Do you really want to be in a restaurant, in a classroom, or any other public space with the real possibility of this type of panic happening? Do you really want an 18 year old guy that you don't know sitting across from you at the food court, too much to drink, low intelligence, trying to impress his friends carrying a gun all the time??
I'd be happier if we worked on making it harder for nut jobs and immature gun freaks from being able to carry guns, not throw our hands up in defeat and hand one to everyone under the guise of "protection." That's cowardly.
There are stories everywhere about someone shooting a gun in the air at a party in celebration, only to cause a panic, leading others to pull their guns out and inevitably cause tragedies.
Um, ya, have never, ever heard of that happening. Sounds like that urban legend about firing your gun into the air and the bullet will come down and kill someone, also proven false on Mythbusters.
Pulling their gun out and shooting it into the air, this guys been watching too many old western movies, lol.
Sounds like that urban legend about firing your gun into the air and the bullet will come down and kill someone, also proven false on Mythbusters.
So since these stories are everywhere, you won't have a problem naming just one, right?
The brother of a friend of mine was killed (shot to death) sitting in his car while on a hunting trip. He was carrying both a sidearm and had a hunting rifle next to him. Adam Lanza's mother owned an entire arsenal to protect herself and ended up with 4 bullets in her head from her own weapons.
There are about 10,000 gun homicides per year in the USA.
Just the 500-600 accidental gun deaths per year in the USA is about the same as the total gun homicides in Switzerland, Canada, Finland, Sweden, Spain, Germany, Israel, Australia, the UK and Japan combined.
The actual facts demonstrate how dangerous an armed population is.
Gabby Giffords was shot in Tucson, Arizona. There was an armed civilian nearby who nearly shot the person who disarmed the shooter.
Im from the uk, gun crime is rare here.
shareHow insanely high is your other crime? Nevermind, we already know.
Fire Bat
Only a fool would deny God.
I'm from the uk also and yes while gun crime is rare , knife crime and drug related crimes are extremely high not to mention the gang beating that seem to always happen. So while there's not much gun crime there is crime every country has crime no place is untouched by violence!
shareYou are wrong : higher rates of gun ownership do not GENERALLY correlate with higher rates of gun-related deaths, either accidental or intentional.
Check Switzerland, for instance, where 80% of the male population above 20 is armed, usually with the mandatory assault rifle provided by the Swiss army. Gun deaths are among the lowest in Europe, and just as importantly, violent crimes and interpersonal violence are also among the lowest in the world.
Other examples of high levels of gun ownership - associated or not with lax legal measures against carrying and concealed weapons - that do NOT correlate with higher overall crime, violence and deaths include Finland (a country where everyone is a hunter and where 10% of the male population can be considered a proficient sniper), Serbia, Uruguay (the 'peaceful pearl' of South America), and in the U.S, South Dakota, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, all States known for their rather low crime-rates and very 'middle-america' lifestyles.
In short, I think you are willfully ignoring much more important factors (regarding violent deaths and gun violence) : wealth distribution, racial composition and ethnic heterogeneity, religious tensions, demographic structure and the 'young males problem', etc. Are you sure you are trying to be objective ? Or are you simply attempting to blame as much as possible on the guns themselves instead of considering what their owners do and why they do it ?
I am with the OP on this one : guns are an equalizer, they put a 200lb hardened criminal on par with a well-trained freshman, a rabid maniac on the same ground as a lone girl, a mob armed with sticks and swords on equal footing with a lone nerd. When everyone is armed violence becomes harder to resort to, and discussion is actually preferable for everyone in conflict resolution.
True, It will always remain impossible to easily deter a determined madman dedicated to his 'purification' mission ; just as it was always impossible to guard yourself against assassination : no matter who you are or what you do, if someone is truly determined to kill you, well, there's not much you can do to prevent it. The question is : what's the best system OVERALL and taking the statistics into account ?
I for sure love my guns, have never killed anyone, hope I never will, and would die protecting my right to stay in charge of my own safety and the safety of my friends and family. This is democracy for you in a nutshell : responsible enough to VOTE ? Well, then you're responsible enough to balance your right to self-defense and you inner primate urges to go *beep* and kill everyone who pisses you off.
Can't have one without the other.
Exactly! You can see what happened to the totally unarmed policemen! Let this be a warning to y'all!
shareArizona has very good gun laws so Timothy McVeigh had to use explosives that killed 168 people?
I hope you never have to defend me in court.
--------------------------------
"Look at banner Michael!"
whats funny is how people that don't want the population being armed yet they are super okay with government being armed. how many iraqi civilians were killed at the hands of u.s. weapons? yeah over a million. even with gun crimes in the u.s. it would take hundreds of years to have over a million killed with firearms. The boston bombers? no guns used. I think every american should have a gun. that's what makes us american. but you also have the freedom to not have a gun. Just don't go after my guns. i own 2 ar 15's 3 glocks and a shotgun. If anyone tried putting me and my family on a truck to a fema detention camp they will be met with resistance. Everyone thinks that could never happen here. They felt the same way in Nazi germany. Also in 1911 Turkey banned the guns for the citizens. two years later they killed over a million armenians. I'm half armenian so im biased. but never again!!!
When i ask someone who is anti gun that if my health should be my own responsibility....they agree. i shouldnt eat mcdonalds and sugary foods. So if my health is my own responsibility... and not that of the government. Shouldn't my safety be my own responsibility as well? that's independence. my finances should also be my own responsibility too correct? I shouldn't give up on life and live on government welfare. Which i could do. I have health issues. but i don't. i work.
Adam Lanza tried buying firearms legally and was denied. So he had to kill his mother, drag her body to her biometric safe. (which i dont like. someone can kill you and cut off your thumb to be able to get into your safe) and stole the guns. So it lets you know the gun control in place now works. It's just government doesn't want us armed because they want absolute power over us. If you want to be a victim or a slave by all means be anti gun. Theres a reason why the founders drafted the second amendment. It was very important to them and their freedom. it could have been the 8th amendment or 10th, etc....
Ah, we kinda live in a different world now... You seriously think the answer to gun massacres in America is more guns? Come live in Australia, we don't have this problem. We had a massacre, and we took away people's guns. Because people cant be trusted with them. Maybe you should stop thinking about YOUR safety and YOUR rights and think about the rest of society. You can't bring up Nazi Germany and Turkey 1911, we've come a long way from there. o-one's going to cart you off to a damn fema camp. You assume that just because people are in government they want to take away your freedom. They don't. Guns make your society more dangerous. You might think you're doing the right thing by your family being pro-gun, but you're certainly not doing the right by society. Loving guns doesn't make you American, it just makes you stupid. If Adam Lanza's mum didn't have guns then he coudn't have shot up that school. Not everyone is going to be as responsible as you... the only way to stop gun crime is to take away your guns. Sorry.
share"Come live in Australia, we don't have this problem."
Mate, there is a shooting at least once a day in my state alone. Do a search on any Aussie news site. The gun buyback did nothing but take firearms away from honest people.
I think every american should have a gun. that's what makes us american.
Yeah, because no people have ever been gunned down in Texas and Arizona...
Working in the movie business since -92
[deleted]
Wow. lets you know how dangerous an unarmed populace is... when all the cops in your town are morons *fixed
[deleted]
Funny how conservatives and pro-gun people keep interpreting anything as an excuse for needing more guns.
So you see dozens of people getting killed by guns (yes, by guns, not people) and your solution is more guns...? I can't even...
People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs
Less people would die if this happened every month instead of every single dimwit owning a gun.
share