MovieChat Forums > The Story of India (2007) Discussion > Michael Wood's weird disdain for the Wes...

Michael Wood's weird disdain for the West


I see Wood rejoices on the first episode of "The Story of India" (for the millionth time) that the "brief heyday of the West" is supposedly ending, and India is reclaiming what he seems to believe is its "rightful place" (along with China) of hegemony in the world's new order.

Since the series was canned in 2007, it's rather hard to see what he means. It was hard even then, since India's economic boom, like China's, was so export-driven, and India doesn't seem to be creating any new technologies. But now that the supposedly useless and kaput nations of North America and Europe are no longer in a position to gobble up consumer goods from East and South Asia, I think we are going to see a mysterious contraction of Indian and Chinese growth.

I don't understand Wood AT ALL. He travels by Boeing or Airbus jets to the scenes of past glories, records himself and all that scenery on high-tech western cameras to be shown on high definition western TV sets on flourishing western television broadcast and cable systems, and sucks up to present-day Indians and Chinese as if they were were the brothers of Ashoka and Confucius instead of English-speaking graduates of western style Asian universities based on Oxford and Humboldt's Prussian educational system.

When he strolls around India (notably not immersing himself along with all those other Indians in the picturesque but polluted Ganges), ignoring the squalor and romanticizing the country's industrial future (which looks like it's going to consist in the near-term of a lot of smokestack industries using last-generation western technology), he is in a country where millions might have starved decades ago if it hadn't been for the development in the West of miracle crops and new industrial fertilizers.

A belching smokestack and a polluted skyline in any western city is a sure shorthand for doom with Wood, but the same thing in China or India isn't, because Wood would rather die than include it in one of his documentaries.

Wood's own religious views we don't know, but he likes anybody else's non-western ones, and he'll put up with absolutely anything as long as it's based on a non-western religion. That includes the horrendous sacrifices of the Aztecs. Presumably he will also put up with present-day amputations of thieves' hand or stoning of adulteresses or executions of homosexuals in the middle east and Africa. Non-western peoples are just acting according to their cultural natures. Even their atrocities are justified by their deep spirituality.

That it was the cultural nature of a 16th Century Spaniard to lay waste to Peru is not similarly legitimate, and that his religion required him to burn at the state the same Aztecs who had just been cutting out people's hearts and bathing their temples with fresh blood is a manifestation of the ugliness Wood always associates with the West he comes from. Its atrocities are justified by nothing.

He is willing to write a pass for the Greeks, because they are a comparatively poor country, and so many corners of Greece seem to him lands that time forgot. If he can find in present-day Greek folkways a survival of the Eleusinian Mysteries, there may be hope for the Greeks. They'll have to regress to save themselves, but if they can only relocate themselves outside of modern western culture and stay as pagan as possible they might meet in the middle with eastern countries he thinks have cleverly managed not to surrender to Logical Positivism.

The thing is, Wood himself reminds me a heap more of Descartes than of Lao Tzu. Does he loathe himself? Or does he just displace his self-loathing onto people like you and me whose classical education hasn't led us to the conclusion that a madrasa or a yurt beats a campus or a highrise apartment?

Mind you, Wood is good at what he does. He has a deep appreciation for all these old cultures, and thank God, he hasn't recoiled yet at his own reliance on western philology, DNA analysis, archaeology, etc. to elucidate it all, or on high tech equipment and media to disseminate his testimony. So I really like his shows.

But I'm a little sick of being blamed for everything. Wind farms, solar panels, etc., are being developed and brought on line in western countries at the very time athletes in Beijing are wearing masks to protect them from pollution, when China is killing its lakes and rivers and supporting genocide in the Sudan to get at that country's fossil fuels. Western countries are stable and functioning with adequate constabularies while Indians (with sympathetic police looking on) are razing historic mosques to the ground, and Hindus and Muslims are burning one another alive.

It's not just the modernistic manifestations for rising Asian economies (those western infections) that are the problem, either. Traditional Chinese medicine is wiping out the African rhino, and whoever's to blame for bride-killing and honor slaying in India and Pakistan, it isn't Henry Ford or John Dewey.

Did Wood notice how beautiful the neoclassical home of the British-founded Asiatic Society of Kolkata must once have been, and how shabby it is now? Somebody really should raise some funds to renovate it. I'm sure somebody in the decadent and dying western democracies will get right on that.

reply

While I agree with some points you make about west being blamed. but most of what you say is poorly researched, many points you raise shout ignorance. Wood has a better appreciation and thereby better understanding world cultures which you are lacking.

reply

I agree with the OP. I'm an American who is educated and pretty liberal, and I get tired of people like Wood overly romanticizing non-western cultures while having so much disdain for their own culture. This is a very unbalanced, inaccurate way of viewing the world. I really enjoyed The Story of India but found his attitude towards the West irksome, especially when he didn't really address the many problems in India. These problems cannot be blamed on the British (not saying they didn't do terrible things). I hope that the next generation of historians embraces a more balanced view of history. I admire what Michael Wood has accomplished with this documentary; I don't mean to be overly critical.

reply

[deleted]

It's classic western elitist behavior to put the west down then recieve praise for it. English people do this a lot, meanwhile they set themselves up as experts on these alien places and go on and on knowing more than the actual people who live there.

I'd like to know how wonderful he'd feel if suddenly he was in an untouchable caste and people wanted to puke seeing him on TV.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

The caste system is an atrocity and anyone who get excited about it is either evil or stupid.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

It's function?

It's function is to create and enforce a capitalist-like division of labor that you can never get out of.

Find me someone who describes the function of Nazis, KKK, racism. The only person who would do that with a smile would be an idiot.

Additionally, the caste system was based on race. The dark Australoid people who originally lived in India were placed on the bottom by the white invaders who invented Hinduism. So, Hinduism is a racist religion designed to oppress people based on the nonsense idea that they deserve it from "past life" behavior.

That's disgusting.

If you don't believe me google The Laws of Manu, read it, and all will be explained.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

Are you kidding?

He narrates the whole show like a kid who just got an Xbox for Christmas. He's manic about it all.

I'd like to see him in some sweatshop in NYC going on and on about how "It juuuust woooorks," to have legals work for nothing and in fear for the United States. Illegal aliens are a part of our economy, because they're there doing things and keeping prices low and profits high. The exploitation of labor has always been a part of our culture so hey, it's a reality and it works, right?

Not right and no one would ever say it like that on TV.

However, in some foreign land where a bunch of strange monkeys live it's OK to have quasi-humans who are born and die being reviled for crimes they never committed and forced to do disgusting jobs.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

easypz,

Unless you're manic I don't see how he's not. He certainly doesn't have the affect of Henry Kissinger, nor does he have the objective tone of a news reporter. What he does is look excited and has a kind of sports announcer tone to his voice. It's silly that I have to explain basic things like this; have never seen another program before?

Right:

He said about the lowest caste "It juuuust woooorks!" regarding their order in the caste and the division of labor. I just watched the show as of my first posting. I posted while I was watching!

Traveler:

The show isn't a travel show, it's an educational show about the culture.

Again, a show would never be made in the west, about the west, where human rights and legal violations which are de facto institutions are enthusiastically said to just work. It's racist to say that human rights violations are ok for people who had the misfortune to be born in some weird culture, that is unless you're an evil fool who believes in karma.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

That is the episode, and if he doesn't say those exact words then he says something very close. Then he goes on to interview the guy who from birth has had no choice but to handle dead people goes on to rationalize his existence and the English guy is like "Right oh! Now back to my luxury hotel! Chin up and don't forget to wash your hands old boy!"

Watch it again.

Traveler:

No, a traveler goes to a place to experience it and ask questions. I've done a bit of traveling and when talking to people I keep my mouth shut about the place and want to hear what the average person says about their home. This show is a documentary where an "expert" is telling us from his perspective what this country and culture is like.

As I've said, he would not, or at least it would be highly unlikely, that he would come to the US or UK and enthusiastically run down the culture benefits of racism and economic exploitation, all of which are part of it all and have benefits from a certain perspective.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

Perhaps you should check your weird transcript of the show, he says what I reported shortly before it.

It's very amusing how you find flatly denying, or ignoring, my points to be an acceptable strategy. Are you connected with this program?

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

You're some kind of shill for this ignorant bourgeois product, or a strange obsessive.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

Please post a link to the transcript, if you can, I'll retract the shill comment, not that what I said wasn't televised. I'm pretty familiar with how productions go, and the script isn't necessarily how it ends up when filmed.

In spite of your transcript, I know what I heard because it moved me to post. My TV is six feet from this position and the program in question was on. There were no manic Englishmen within a thousand feet, I can guarantee it.

Meanwhile, you've been playing an intellectually dishonest game. The tone of the show is overwhelmingly positive about a system of massive oppression based on race and nonsensical mysticism---no westerner would wish to be born into---and many Indians are unlucky enough to be. The tone of the show is "thiiiis is soooo grrreat" whether or no you can find it in the transcript or not, so your reductionistic argument centered on the existence of three words doesn't work or matter.

Look at the big picture.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

So you're a shill for the show.



Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]

TheAdlerian,

And you are going on ranting and ranting talking about the caste system, claming to be an all across expert on it's origins and meaning.

It is clear that you are completely unaware on many aspects of the caste system starting with the fact that it was originally not by birth but the constitution of any human being. It was later around 500-600 years ago that it started taking shape in its current perverted form as caste-by-birth.

Whether you want it or not caste or better inclination/make up of a person is present everywhere in the world!! There are people who are more intellectual, then those who are more aggressive/warrior/Alpha types, the people with keen business acumen and others who are either drop outs/criminally oriented.

Only if you knew that almost all of the ancient spiritual texts/epics/literature/scientific shastras of India were written by people of "lower" class by birth!! surpise surprise !! ..because it was not by birth to begin with !

Reading the Laws of Manu you would think that the equating the feet to the lower caste amounts to disdain !! Again an interpretation with consummate ignorance
and preudice looking at it from a western viewpoint. In India the feet are worshipped and revered. No one part from head to toe is decidedly inferior!

One thing agreed that the present caste system by birth is totally unfair but
instead of beating you chest sore on what Michael Wood meant or looking at an ancient culture with riduculous amounts of ignorance about it roots and disdain, I would say sincerely research about it first, learn by what a tremendous amount the caste system by birth has reduced in India.

And most importantly have peace with yourself first! Your mental agitation and anger is not doing any good to the world either!






reply

What nonsense!

If you look at Nazi policy towards jews, from the Nazi standpoint, you'll get a very heroic picture too. Few feel they can get away with that though and still feel human.

Anger is a massive system of oppression which Indians mask through a false polite and seemingly deep quality. The caste system and everything associated is a shameful lie and euphemism for slavery.

Phillyfreedomforum.com

A free speech forum, not just for Philly!

reply

[deleted]