Both movies of course have questionable facts, and amateur editing, but overall, I thought Addendum was a nice improvement over the first one, as it presented more interviews, so it actually felt at least a tinge more credible. The material was also more interesting this time around.
Anyone who thinks the Bible is compatible with modern morality needs to read Gen 19:1-9 and 30-36.
yeah unfortunatley in alot sites where people ask about the movie in particulary zeitgeist addendum you have people giving copy and pasted answers debunking the first one and not even mentioning the 2nd which is a shame because people judge the movement and film by the first films standards even though peter joseph and many movement members who are atheists comsider it something that should not have been made due to the fact that it detracts from the message of the second movie and really it is more thought out supported and credible than the first.So judge the movement and second movie by the standards of the second movie by its own merit and not on the incredibly low standards of the 1st.
There are no absolutetes no right,no wrong just choices -- Jasmine
More interesting? Are you kidding me? I could only watch one part at a time, taking a mental break between each one. The speaker just is so incredibly boring, he just drones on and on and on...
well you get the picture. I did agree with the economic hitmen section.... but to blindly put your faith in science is just about as absurd as the movie claims with religion. I mean, what really has destroyed nations? Their faith, or their new dangerous inventions.
And seriously, science has never lied to us *cough cough, Climategate.
Is it really the inventions that is dangerous, or is it how you use them? Someone must've made the inventions that you talk about, in a bad purpose... it isn't science's fault that it's being misused.
share