MovieChat Forums > Steven Seagal: Lawman (2009) Discussion > Lucky Steven wasnt SUED

Lucky Steven wasnt SUED

posted 14 years ago by orion_ff58
3 replies | jump to latest

I like Seagal and the show.. However I could not believe what I saw in the Season 2 opener head on collision.

You NEVER remove the patient from a major head on crash like that without the victim being stabilized " unless the car is on fire or going to catch fire or other serious danger. "

With that major impact, he could have seriously injured or paralyzed those people even more.

Steven, less martial arts and more medical training if you plan on doing this job seriously...

[–] Fmartiterron 14 years ago

To his credit, he only asked the people on the SUV to leave the car because they could do it by their own feet. But as soon as the driver on the other car told him he was in pain he moved away and waited for the paramedics.

I don't like Seagal, but I think he did well in that situation.

[–] altek 13 years ago

Exactley,The situation/injuries must be assesed first & foremost but once that has been adequetly done then & only then can the patient be transported to the nearest medical facility...Such as a hospital

[–] One_Man_Army 13 years ago

You do realize that Seagal has been doing the job for a good 20 years, don't you? He even has a house there that he lives in for some of the year, and he's been doing the job seriously for about 2 decades now. He hasn't received any major complaints, yet. Seagal did the right thing in that episode.

ALL HAIL THE HIGH QUEEN!!!!!