why are people calling this movie disguised porn? for porn there should be graphic sex and nudity. tell me one scene where you see bare breasts or bush or even pubic area for that matter.
its not everybody's cup of tea but just calling it porn because it addressed sexual issues upfront is very idiotic.
Stop worrying about narrow-minded people...
sharewell said man...
shareMaybe the problem is that the portrayal is so abysmal it's obscene!
But then, abysmal may be the wrong term. How about lousy. No that's an hygiene issue. What we're looking for is a term that captures the worthlessness, the meaninglessness, the wastefulness of this movie. In short, porn.
pornography
The explicit depiction of sexual subject matter, especially with the sole intention of sexually exciting the viewer.
go look up in the dictionary before you use the word porn. of course the movie has a wastrel of a protagonist. its devdas what did you expect? this movie shows more balls than all the srk movies(not that i hate them) combined.
if u dont like it fine. go watch something "IMPORTANT".
[deleted]
Yeah in India, you'd get the same people who'd get worked up at a cleavage shot. But I don't think all in India are that afraid, it's just the same loudmouths that like to kick up a fuss and protest at anything.
shareyeah hrithik and aishwarya's kiss was rated obscene in dhoom 2 and that was a pathetic kissing scene. nothing "hot" about it.
shareRaj, it's a proof that watching MTV doesn't make people broad minded, as they claim to be.
shareI wouldn't call it porn that is just stupid. But the sexual aspects weren't portayed very well. It was just kind of disgusting in my opinion.
I'm American, and I felt really uncomfortable watching this movie.
LMAO somebody actually called it that? fcken village idiot
share