Thanks for posting this article. I'll be following this story very closely. I can't wait to see what the documentary has to say...

reply

Here are some less biased articles.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/world/americas/01ecuador.html?hp
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125208172990086901.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aVa3YWX4h0JE

Synopsis:
"The recordings indicate that an Ecuadoran political operative was working to obtain $3 million in bribes related to environmental cleanup contracts to be awarded in the event of a ruling against Chevron."

It looks like the Ecuadorean Politicians may have exploited the grief of these people to try and stuff their pockets. If I am not mistaken the government was actually paid by Texaco to dispose of this waste in the first place (not sure, you can fact check me)?

Still, it is sad that these people and their children have to suffer like this.

reply

Multinational companies profit from the exploitation of the people who live in the area they're sucking dry 365 days a year - that is what they do.
Yet you choose to highlight $3m sought by local politicians?
How sad that you feel the need to focus on such a relatively trivial sum, when multinationals - especially oil companies - do far worse, for far, far more.
But of course I'm biased - and you're not.

UG UG

reply

Cinesimonj: I think you miss Capt's point. No one questions how awful these oil spills are, along with the obvious cover-up going on to protect powerful interests. In no way, however, does that justify local politicians looking to fatten their wallets. Likewise, in no way does their greed justify the activities of oil companies that abuse indigenous peoples and mistreat the communities and biomes where they drill, whether by neglect or intention. Both are true; they are not mutually exclusive.

Further, Capt provides links to more news stories so we can make up our own minds on this issue. You, on the other hand, rely on two-bit sarcasm. All information is valid in this case.

Your initial point proves your bias; it's a sweeping generalization. If Chevron/Texaco wasn't drilling that oil, and an Ecuadorian firm instead were doing the drilling, would you feel better? Would the people be any less exploited?
Very, very doubtful, given how native oil industries (including Venezuela's) treat their own.

I have zero love for Chevron-Texaco. Zero. But I look around my home, by the same token, and see many products that would not be here were it not for petroleum. If we are all going to practice our two minutes hate on oil corporations, then by all means, let's completely destabilize the entire Western world economies (since plastics come from petroleum, and everything that uses plastics, etc.) so we can all feel as self-righteous as you do.

Whether you work for a for-profit or nonprofit, we all depend on petroleum, period, and no alternative energy is going to change that fact until such sources can replace everything petroleum touches.

reply

And here so many people like you, who either claim there educated ('what's Europe, ohhh a continent, well that`s interesting'), or are simply proven uneducated, sorry but watching the same propaganda news day by day, e.g. F** News, and looking up the same www pages, obviously does NOT really make you any smarter... but maybe ever more st***d than you already are?

Anyway some people on this earth would really be fortunate for accessing such resources.

btw.:

petroleum-free bags are made from GMO free certified corn

www.biobagusa.com/

guess they don't show this on Fu** News, eh?

reply

lol @ "claim there educated"

Seriously guy, don't bother attacking people's intelligence if you have a poor grasp of grammar and punctuation.

reply