MovieChat Forums > Crude (2010) Discussion > Steve Donziger attempts to extort billio...

Steve Donziger attempts to extort billions from Chevron


First Gasland, now another eco-documentary discredited.

Plaintiffs' Experts Say 'No Evidence' For Billions In Damages Against Chevron http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2013/04/12/plaintiffs-experts -say-no-evidence-for-billions-in-damages-against-chevron/

Beltman’s affidavit appears carefully constructed to inflict the maximum damage upon Donziger, a former journalist who initiated the lawsuit in 1993 after graduating from Harvard Law School. Chevron filed a civil racketeering suit against Donziger and Stratus, accusing them of fabricating the evidence in the Ecuador case as part of a multibillion-dollar shakedown scheme. The Stratus executives submitted their statements as part of a settlement ending the lawsuit against them.

In his statement, Beltman describes a process orchestrated by Donziger and financed by Joseph Klein, a Philadelphia plaintiffs’ attorney who poured millions of dollars into the case only to quit in disgust in 2010, saying Donziger’s misconduct made it “highly unlikely that any court in the United States or elsewhere would ever enforce any judgment” he might obtain.

Joe Kohn was just the first of a series of financial backers who have been disappointed by Donziger’s Fitzcarraldo-like quest for riches in the jungles of Ecuador. He’s also enticed law firms including Motley Rice and Patton Boggs in Washington to sign on to the case, although Chevron has thus far refused to negotiate the settlement that would reward all the participants with a significant chunk of any money they obtain.

A second affidavit by Ann Maest, managing scientist at Stratus, backs Beltman’s allegations that Donziger orchestrated the process of constructing the damages estimate. Maest says there was no evidence of petrochemicals migrating from waste pits at the abandoned drilling sites, undermining Donziger’s claim that villagers were being poisoned by chemicals in their drinking water.

An attempt to sue Chevron subsidiary in Canada was thrown out. These lawyers are psychopathic morons.
Chevron’s win in Ontario http://opinion.financialpost.com/2013/05/02/peter-foster-chevrons-win- in-ontario/
Why are the plaintiffs pursuing their case in jurisdictions apart from the U.S.? Because their claims have already been declared fraudulent by courts there, and Chevron is pursuing a racketeering charge against Mr. Donziger and co. which is due to start in Manhattan in October.

The plaintiffs’ case has received further hits from a former Ecuadorian judge who came forward in January to admit his role in orchestrating the fraudulent claim. Another of the plaintiffs’ environmental consultants admitted that evidence had been falsified from the outset. Plus one of the plaintiffs’ previous financial backers, a hedge fund named Burford Capital, accused the plaintiffs’ U.S. and Ecuadorean lawyers of fraud and misconduct.

reply

I've been watching these oil company crooks for over 50 years now. I believe this documentary fully and don't trust the big oil companies at all. I'm just surprised and saddened these oil companies weren't put out of business 50 years ago as the criminals they are. The only ones worse or at least as bad are the coal companies. Dirty polluters all.
Oh, and don't say I'm brainwashed. I've been watching what's been going on since the 50's and 60's before there was so much media coverage and the big corporations have gotten completely out of hand thanks to unbridled capitalism. "ANYthing for a buck!"

reply

So you've just chosen to be blind to what's staring you in the face?

The raw documentary footage court ordered for release shows the plaintiff's lawyer admitting that there was no contamination spread, and that that was a problem for their case, but that he could overcome it by intimidating the judge, and could still get lots of money from Chevron.

The filmmakers simply had to know it was a shakedown operation because THEY WERE FILMING THE SHAKEDOWN. They were in on it, Bob.

What does it matter if you've been "watching" the oil companies for over 50 years if you've been doing it with an uncritical eye?

Wake the hell up.

reply