MovieChat Forums > Super Bowl XLIII (2009) Discussion > Steelers suck. His foot wasn't down

Steelers suck. His foot wasn't down


Bleep heads.

Smile and wave boys...Just smile and wave...

reply

the refs were on pitt side all game...

"The Truth may Hurt but to Lie is Agony"

reply

I swear, his feet didn't touch. I SWEAR!!!


Quis custodiet
ipsos custodes?

CotCP

reply

Oh, come on. On that catch, the ref was under the hood for a LONG time. If he saw any good evidence, he would've overturned it. And as for the refs being on Pitts side, if that were true, they never would've called holding that gave Arizona a saftey, and the ball for the Fitzgerald TD.

If a clock doesn't get enough food, does it go back 4 seconds?

reply

While the penalties definitely cost Arizona, they made some big ones against Pittsburgh during the game too. The only thing that annoyed me was that they didn't review the last play. At least they weren't as blatantly favoring Pittsburgh as they were against Seattle three years ago.

reply

I think the calls were fair. You have Pittsburgh who are very big game tested and experiance, on the otherhand inexperiance Cardinals with 0 play-off experiance outside this year, and Kurt Warner really the only experiance figure in that lockeroom. Aswell as them being a incredibly young team. I'd expect the Cards to rack up alot more penalties, and like every good team, they fought through them. Game was called fair.

reply

Santonio's foot hit the ground D I P S H I T!!

U2's new album NO LINE ON THE HORIZON coming MARCH 3, 2009!!!

The Pittsburgh Steelers are the Super Bowl XLIII champions!!

reply

Beat the 49ers and those punk Cowboys to 6 titles. Now it's on to next season.

If a clock doesn't get enough food, does it go back 4 seconds?

reply

N O it D I D N 'T Bleep face.

Smile and wave boys...Just smile and wave...

reply

It was down, Steelers kicked ass, deal with it.

reply

[deleted]

It looks like it did in like 4/5 angles but the fifth one showed his toe was clearly not on the bleeping ground.

Smile and wave boys...Just smile and wave...

reply

Are you high?

You must suspend all disbelief.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Feet were on the ground...period.

reply

I agree.His foot was down.
But his feet were not.

Smile and wave boys...Just smile and wave...

reply

His feet were down. It was a catch. If you truly believe he didn't get his feet down, then you're an idiot. There's no way to sugarcoat this, because it's an undeniable fact that he got his feet down.

reply

And you are truely blind. Undeniable my left cheek. The guy made a herculaean effort..But he didn't get it down. They stole the superbowl and life goes on.


Smile and wave boys...Just smile and wave...

reply

Out-played the Steelers? You don't out-play someone and lose. You either win or lose, both toes where down. Stop the video and look at the catch and toes.

When You Know Better, You'll Do Better.

reply

[deleted]

Hey WoLf_DiGiTaL, it's called tip toeing not feeting or any other cleaver way of saying it.

and miskatonic86, show some pride for your team, you should be happy that the ravens even made it that far with a rookie qb and rookie head coach because i know a fact that you were thinking the ravens were going to suck with Flacco starting. Sure in game 1 the steelers shouldve lost but the ravens just gave it away with the key INT and fumble, and in game 2 the ravens couldnt get their offense going, how did the ravens not get a td in side what the 15 after holmes fumbled the ball?? well suck it up, move on, and look forward to next season bud; because blaming someone without considering other mistakes makes you a damn fool

reply

Steelers fans, you don't have to explain anything to anyone (especially some silly ass Ravens fan - whom we knocked the sh!t out of THREE, yes that's 3 times last year, a clean swweeeep!). The familiar sour grapes whine of 'the refs are on their side" is exactly what it sounds like...a low class sour grapes sissy ass whine. No Steeler fans. All we really got to say is....'We got 6" 'How many you got?"

reply