it's definitely not as bad as it's average rating (i.e. 4.8/10 average with 1,939 votes) suggests it is overall as most of those 5.x/10 rated films (or lower) are usually dissed but to crack into the 4.x/10 area is usually near total crap and this film is not THAT bad overall.
i would still say the film as a whole is at least average-ish and not in that total crap range like it's average suggests it is. it's elevated a bit by Bello/Dorff.
i give it a 6.5/10. even slightly conservative i would give it a 6/10 as it did not waste my time at the very least.
it has some parts that are kind of bad but the overall film i thought was carried by Bello/Dorff. but it is a pretty standard film of the genre so it's not surprising it's rating is not high as it would be looking at a very low 6's AT BEST for a average rating and probably in the mid to upper 5's, but to see a 4.x/10 that's a bit to low.
p.s. in general for me... 6/10 or lower = Thumbs Down. 7/10 or higher = Thumbs Up. so with this film i am sort of on the edge with it as i don't really want to say Thumbs Up, but i don't really want to say Thumbs Down either. but since we can't give in between ratings on IMDb ill be generous and give it a 7/10 instead of a 6/10. i might be able to watch it again but i can tell it's on the back burner in that dept as there are just to many other films out there with higher re-watch priority.
The movie starts out okay, but toward the end it gets silly.. like for example, Roy standing there shooting his hand gun and not moving at all to dodge the car that hits him. He just stands there waiting to get hit. The ammount of times he gets injured and comes out alive is stupid too.. but eh, it's entertainment I guess.
i have to agree here.
but like i was saying above, at the very least, it did not waste my time watching the film as i can at least give it that much.
i mostly watched it for Maria Bello (and maybe Stephen Dorff to (his 'Felon' (2008) (8.5-9/10) was somewhere between my 2nd-4th favorite film of 2008)) so that could have possibly boosted it a bit for me as odds are if you swapped Bello/Dorff with some random no name actors i would have probably not given it more than a 6/10 for sure, possibly a bit less. but then again if you removed them from the film i probably would have never bothered to watch it in the first place. lol
so for me they elevated a otherwise pretty standard film that's been done quite a few times before.
I'd rate this film 6/10 - slightly above average for having a few moments of sharp dialogue.
it appears you got the scale based on math which is 5/10 is average and you go below average or above average depending on what side of it you are.
but for me my scale is like this in simple terms...
7/10 or higher = Thumbs Up
6/10 = average-ish (depending on what side of that your on whether it's a 'solid 6' or 'weak 6'. but usually most films that land on a 6 at least did not waste my time.)
5/10 = bordering on crap
4/10 or less = failure (usually films that land here i am genuinely bored by to where i have little to no interest in continuing to watch and that's the worst crime a film can commit)
but i mostly formulated my, "6/10 or less = Thumbs Down. 7/10 or higher = Thumbs Up", rating scale based on my perception of IMDb which is usually this in terms of average ratings...
7.x/10 or higher = generally positive opinions
6.x/10 = mixed ratings (like some might like it and some people might not. especially depending on if your on the higher or lower side of the 6's)
5.x/10 or less = generally negative opinions
----------
My Vote History ...
http://imdb.to/rb1gYH----------
reply
share