The family house

Cool, thanks. I feel a little less crazy now.

In the special features in the DVD of this movie, someone or other discusses the inside set versus the outside. The inside set was used in several movies. They deliberately made the inside of the "house" dark in tone. They had to edit the movement from inside to outside and vice-versa. It got tricky, I think, especially when Oscar feels sick and has to run upstairs to the bathroom. I think the editing is smooth. It's interesting to me, because the acting for any particular scene (inside/outside) doesn't take place on the same day. It took weeks to film this movie. When you listen to the British version director, Frank Oz, discussing this, they had to actually map out where any one person was standing/doing, so there would be continuity from one day's shooting to another. I don't remember LaBute talking about this, but I'm pretty certain there were similar concerns. Just think: all the actors had to wear the same costumes for weeks and days. When Zoe Salander was up on the "roof" (another set), she ripped her dress as she climbed to the top. They had to have duplicate costumes and seamstresses at the ready to repair rips and tears.
Continuity becomes another issue for Tracy Morgan's uh... stuff... on his shirt. Excuse the long answer; one thing led to another in my mind.
I have little patience for those who just post "Worst Film Ever" or some other such; people work so hard to make a film.