I could have sworn I seen this episode already. But the original air date says today January 14th 2017. Does anyone remember the original air date?
shareI had to figure this out too because it totally threw me off. The Halloween Route 666 episode contained scenes from entire episodes of season 13. I was watching tonight's episode thinking "wait a minute, wtf, I've seen this before, but how?" Wikipedia figured it out for me.
shareYes I remember too it's a re-hash from
S13, Ep6
29 Oct. 2016
Halloween special: Route 666
Thanks. I couldn't find it in any of the episode titles for all the seasons. I thought I was going crazy for a minute there.
shareYes,I try to follow every episode when I have time...I never get tired of the episodes,I hope a studios gets the rights/licensing to release all the seasons on correct air-date order,I was so annoyed when they released some inferior dvd sets,missing episodes...I would love a blu-ray release!
shareThe 2016 Halloween special was titled "Route 666" and did not carry a season/episode number. As far as s13e06, it aired on 2016-11-12 and was titled "Hotel Metlen". The episode was unrelated.
shareSo last episode was another fcking rerun? So fcking lame.
CG gore is the worst thing that has ever happened to the horror genre.
Pretty sure this is an example of the Mandela Effect, guys. See? It's real. I got "proof", like Zak.
No, you're right, of course. His buddy, Nick, did the same thing last night: package 2 old shows together -- at least in the tv guide -- and called it new. Pretty nasty/cheap. Wonder if they're saving episodes for February sweeps? Not that's a good excuse.
I read while I have these shows on usually, so I'm not totally paying attention. Did Zak have a real girlie, hissy-fit at the end of the episode, or was that the episode after it? Not that it makes much difference. I think that was the "spider attacking his jugular"...?! VERY embarrassing. ;9)B
One thing I picked-up on... and I'm no Sherlock: so, these brave duds are bailing on the dummy who drew a circle to conjure demons "to fight fire with fire" -- although that's not Satanism, Zak assures us. Aaron is yelling after Zak and Billy to come back because where they were going in their cowardly frenzy was ON TOP of the bridge... makes sense (NOT). He and Jay are telling them the salt(?) circle they're currently in is the safest place to be. Then the narrator, Zak, says: "Aaron convinces Jay [who had cast the circle/performed the demonic ritual, and is trying to finish it, OR ELSE SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN TO HIM, he said] to leave the circle, and he (Aaron) doesn't understand the danger he'll face" -- or what ever melodramatic way he put it. WHY would that dumb "cheney" leave the protection of the circle (pardon the cliché), and follow them to the dangerous place?!
I know this is as scripted as pro wrestling, but just make it plausible. Continuity is everything, and doesn't really cost anything.
I feel cheated, Last week [De Soto Hotel] and this weeks episode [Goatmans Bridge] were both S13E06 Route 66, Have they ran out of places to investigate that they had to split one show into two too end the series ?
And while i am here is anyone else getting fedup of every single so called haunting is by evil spirits that just want to harm or kill !!
Thank God somebody else finally noticed. For at least the last month they have been posting episodes that I thought I must have magically watched in another life and Travel Channel is insisting this is a "new" episode.
I've been keeping an eye out on imdb to see if I'm the only one having this issue. It's good to know I'm not losing my mind after all. What I want to know is, why are they passing these off as new episodes? Do they get paid for these "new" episodes and that's why they (Zak's team) resurrected them?
This was explained a month ago in the 'Episode List' thread:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1319900/board/flat/261511971